{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12","title":"论数码物的存在","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208154346","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12","id":"0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12","uuid":"0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12","title":"论数码物的存在","normalized_title":"论数码物的存在","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208154346","isbns":["9787208154346"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":317,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E8%AE%BA%E6%95%B0%E7%A0%81%E7%89%A9%E7%9A%84%E5%AD%98%E5%9C%A8","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12/search"},"page":{"printed_page":"189 / 177","pdf_page":187,"physical_index":187,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"b0c6f193cd73b11b76f40dbda14e0f33cf555d8b562b20caea82e01f60237681"},"chapter":"第三章","content":"逻辑与客体\n\n在前两部分中，我们研究了关系的概念，它使我们能够抛弃作为表征的客体概念，并允许我们从客体转向系统。在第四章末尾，我们遗留了一个问题，它将在第三部分中得到解答：融合是海德格尔与西蒙东提出的哲学任务。这不仅是对数码物的诠释，也是思考数码物未来发展的需要。解答是“回到事情本身”。对西蒙东而言，这意味着回到技术物；对海德格尔而言，它意味着建立客体与事物之间的本体论区别。我们的解答也是回归数码物，既回归到技术成分，也回归其工作原理。因此逻辑，作为计算的最基本方面，是无法避免的。摆在我们面前的哲学任务是回答以下问题：什么样的逻辑能够产生一种有利于融合的新型网络状结构?这是本章的主要问题，本章提出通过寻找西蒙东所说的数码物概念化的转导逻辑来解决这个问题。此处我决定回到胡塞尔，这不仅是因为胡塞尔是“回到事物本身”这一口号的创始人，而且也是因为胡塞尔所谓的内涵逻辑是有价值的，这是对形式逻辑或弗雷格等人的外延逻辑的批判。胡塞尔尝试发展一种既是形式又是意向性的逻辑。胡塞尔与弗雷格之间的争论在计算理论中很少得到解决。本章认为，内涵逻辑可以充当西蒙东意义上的转导逻辑发展的出发点。这将包括对胡塞尔现象学(其主要目的是破坏纯粹自我)的反思，以及(如果可能的话)实现西蒙东与胡塞尔的和解。\n\n第五章\n\n189\n\n177","previous_page":186,"next_page":188}