{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12","title":"论数码物的存在","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208154346","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12","id":"0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12","uuid":"0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12","title":"论数码物的存在","normalized_title":"论数码物的存在","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208154346","isbns":["9787208154346"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":317,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E8%AE%BA%E6%95%B0%E7%A0%81%E7%89%A9%E7%9A%84%E5%AD%98%E5%9C%A8","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12/search"},"page":{"printed_page":213,"pdf_page":223,"physical_index":223,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"5aca3b124de08f27ff09eba39ee8bb24ef15ffb6d51abad5a0daf00dac7636b2"},"chapter":"第三章","content":"不是我们看到物体和事物，而是我们首先谈论它们。更准确地说：我们不是言说我们所看到的，而是相反，我们看到了人们关于此物的所言。[11]\n\n这是因为海德格尔认为古希腊的逻各斯不是作为工具意义上的语言，而是作为去蔽的过程。[12]在《存在与时间》的开篇，海德格尔试图将逻各斯的意义理解为言谈、话语(Reden),而非理性。对海德格尔而言，ζωovλóγoνéXov作为“人是理性的动物”的译文必须重新诠释为“人是具有“话语潜力’的动物”。[13]逻各斯现在是存在去蔽的途径。因此,作为话语的逻各斯(而非现代意义上的语言),而不是被理解为理性、逻辑等的逻各斯与存在物的存在(Beingofbeings)关系更大。动物(Zωov)与“来自作为此在的特定模式的话语主要经验”[14]的生活直接相关。现在，这一λóγov-λéγetv(规定、排列)的主要经验是真理与去蔽的决定性时刻。[15]在此意义上，真理与逻各斯之间的关系是复杂的，“此在永远处于真理与假象中”这句话的含义是值得注意的。在命题逻辑中，真理基于识别与派生，意向客体的当下化(making-present)。这一当下化不适用于谬论、错觉等情况，这就是为什么真理与假象形成识别达成协议的条件。然而，在海德格尔的阐释学逻辑中，真理假设了归属而非识别；真理(Aletheia)同时遮蔽且去蔽，海德格尔使用\n\n第六章 逻辑与时间\n\n226\n\n213","previous_page":212,"next_page":214}