{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12","title":"论数码物的存在","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208154346","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12","id":"0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12","uuid":"0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12","title":"论数码物的存在","normalized_title":"论数码物的存在","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208154346","isbns":["9787208154346"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":317,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E8%AE%BA%E6%95%B0%E7%A0%81%E7%89%A9%E7%9A%84%E5%AD%98%E5%9C%A8","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12/search"},"page":{"printed_page":259,"pdf_page":269,"physical_index":269,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"95ce3a467ada11a41cbc53a627acfcdaed19853936685bef696ea147ccb2d949"},"chapter":"第六章 逻辑与时间","content":"础”作为第九章节第二部分的标题。\n\n[76] Shirky, “Ontology Is Overrated\".\n\n[77]有关标注的早期实验，请参阅Teil and Latour，“HumeMachine”。\n\n[78] Quoted by Flynn, \"Living Body as the Origin of Culture”, 72.\n\n[79]Quoted by Flynn, ibid., 68.\n\n[80 Quoted by Flynn, ibid., 75, from Husserl, Ideas II(Hua IV, 333/345).\n\n第六章 逻辑与时间\n\n[1] Clark and Chalmers, “Extended Mind\" .\n\n[2]Nietzsche，Die Fröhliche Wissenschaft(快乐的科学),section 124:“我们离开了这个国家，上了船!有桥在我们身后另外，我们已经打破了我们身后的土地!但是，到那来临的时候你会知道，那非常无限，而且没有什么比无限更可怕。”http://www.textlog.de/nietzsche-wissen.html.\n\n[3] Caputo, “Language, Logic, and Time\".\n\n[4] Vukicevic, Logik undZeit (逻辑与时间), 4. “Die Frage nach der Logik ist dieFrage der Vorlesungen，vom 25—26 bis zum SS1928”（逻辑的问题是演讲的问题，从1925至1926年到1928年夏季学期)(1925至1926年冬季学期，1927年夏季学期以及1927至1928年冬季学期)，但在这里作者似乎是忽略了非常重要的SS1925讲座，“Historyof theConcept of Time\"。\n\n[5]Heidegger，Gesamtausgabe(海德格尔全集),1:20。“弗雷格的逻辑—数学研究在我看来并没有得到真正意义上的领会，更不用说详细研究了。他在涵义与指称’的著作中关于概念与对象’的论述不能忽视任何数学哲学，但它对这个概念的一般理论同样有价值。”\n\n[6] Caputo, “Language, Logic, and Time\", 149.\n\n[7]Heidegger, “My Way to Phenomenology”, in Time and Being, 76. “但是，我重复的开始也不尽如人意，因为我无法克服主要困难。它涉及一个简单的问题，即如何进行被称为‘现象学’的思考过程方式。”\n\n[8]Mohanty, Logic, Truth, and the Modalities, 83.\n\n[9]《语法思辨》的一半是由托马斯·冯·福(Thomas of Erfurt)而非邓斯·司各脱撰写的。海德格尔意识到这一点，但他仍满意于这部著作；在回复马丁·格拉布曼(MatrinGrabmann)(1917年1月7日)的一封信时，他说：“也许你有兴趣听说这一著作对胡塞尔的启发如此之大，令我感到满意。里克特现在也用不同的眼光看待学术。”Kusch, Language as Calculus, 143.\n\n[10]胡塞尔在《形式逻辑和超验逻辑》中就是这样认为的，49n2。\n\n[11] Heidegger, History of the Concept of Time, section 6, 56.\n\n[12]海德格尔写道：“希腊人没有对应语言的字眼”；SeeBeing and Time，204。\n\n注 释\n\n259","previous_page":258,"next_page":260}