{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12","title":"论数码物的存在","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208154346","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12","id":"0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12","uuid":"0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12","title":"论数码物的存在","normalized_title":"论数码物的存在","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208154346","isbns":["9787208154346"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":317,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E8%AE%BA%E6%95%B0%E7%A0%81%E7%89%A9%E7%9A%84%E5%AD%98%E5%9C%A8","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12/search"},"page":{"printed_page":"272 / 257","pdf_page":267,"physical_index":267,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"42762ba4ee53d126bfe1db2254810e7601e326a5dd575c8fae26dbebb4478d26"},"chapter":"第五章 逻辑与客体","content":"[35]Ibid.，133.弗雷格接受这样一个事实，即指称可能实际上并不存在，但他认为它必须是真实而客观的。例如，考虑这个表达方式：“熟睡中的奥德修斯被推向伊萨卡岛的岸边。”弗雷格声称：“只要我们将这首诗作为一件艺术品看待，奥德修斯的名字是否有指称对我们而言是无关紧要的。”当我们谈到奥德修斯时，一方面是在荷马时代可能存在的人，另一方面是只存在于荷马史诗中的人，那么我们如何指代同一个奥德修斯?我们如何保证这种专名的同一性?这种困境在伯特兰·罗素的著名文章《论指称》中被作为亲知理论的一部分得到进一步讨论。\n\n272\n\n注 释\n\n257","previous_page":266,"next_page":268}