{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","title":"技术至死 数字化生存的阴暗面","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"0120136503","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","id":"13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","uuid":"13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","title":"技术至死 数字化生存的阴暗面","normalized_title":"技术至死数字化生存的阴暗面","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"0120136503","isbns":["0120136503","9787121227776"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":396,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E8%87%B3%E6%AD%BB%20%E6%95%B0%E5%AD%97%E5%8C%96%E7%94%9F%E5%AD%98%E7%9A%84%E9%98%B4%E6%9A%97%E9%9D%A2","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34/search"},"page":{"printed_page":120,"pdf_page":134,"physical_index":134,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"32ddeef01c5b34b98d641168b1f3462b1911eb7eaec144b4ede25e0d27eac082"},"chapter":"技术至死数字化生存的阴暗面","content":"如果这些思想来自加利福尼亚某个读《连线》杂志的桀骜不逊的网络自由主义者，那倒不值得那么关注。但达施勒深深扎根于Ruck.us致力于颠覆的这个结构当中。这里的问题不仅是Ruck.us可能会对政治造成破坏，更在于，“政治版iTunes”这个想法，居然出自一个政治老手的脑袋。在此，互联网中心主义的主导地位或许能告诉我们一些真相。\n\nRuck.us背后的推动力，大都来自这样的观念：我们生活在一个独一无二的时代，一切皆有可能，因为一切都在变化。“政治是美国文化中最后一个尚未被技术根本改变的领域。当你环顾四周，我们生活中的每个领域都有大把选择，除了政治参与渠道：我们仍然只能二选一，”Ruck.us联合创始人格兰德宁说。但“政治版iTunes”究竟意味着什么呢？iTunes所颠覆的，不过是音乐产业批量销售歌曲并称之为唱片的能力。这是否意味着，如果达施勒如愿以偿，只有“重磅议题”(那些得到最多“拉克”或最佳赞助商的议题)才会参选，而那些没那么受欢迎但也许更重要的就不会？这怎么能说是好事情呢，尤其是对那些持不受欢迎的少数派观点的人来说？或者“政治版iTunes”不过是全球理想超市的粗略参考，在那儿公民消费者能选购实现情感幸福最大化而不要求太多回报的理想?除了拿iTunes做类比，还有什么方式能更好地\n\n419世纪的法国思想家和历史学家。\n\n120\n\n枝术至死","previous_page":119,"next_page":121}