{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","title":"技术至死 数字化生存的阴暗面","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"0120136503","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","id":"13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","uuid":"13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","title":"技术至死 数字化生存的阴暗面","normalized_title":"技术至死数字化生存的阴暗面","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"0120136503","isbns":["0120136503","9787121227776"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":396,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E8%87%B3%E6%AD%BB%20%E6%95%B0%E5%AD%97%E5%8C%96%E7%94%9F%E5%AD%98%E7%9A%84%E9%98%B4%E6%9A%97%E9%9D%A2","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34/search"},"page":{"printed_page":162,"pdf_page":176,"physical_index":176,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"166c7b1c311e7b31dce87d1d2d4dfec249209a1ee976f18047860a671255cdb7"},"chapter":"技术至死数字化生存的阴暗面","content":"许多用户(但愿他们知道!)可能对Twitter衡量跨群组讨论受欢迎程度的方式感觉不爽。在此，Twitter相信，与跨不同群组和人口统计学特征的讨论相比，发生在群组内部（在同一区域彼此关注或拥有共同人口统计学特征的用户之间)的讨论不值得出现在“趋势”里。你可能会憎恨全球不平等或喜爱同性恋平等权利，但如果你的“弥母”不管有多么强烈，却没有突破你的群组，它就很可能不会出现在“趋势”里。但正如吉里斯皮所指出，广度优于深度的这种偏好，本身就是高度政治化的选择，建立在对公共讨论运行方式的某种设想之上。\n\n别一心以为过滤器毫无问题、无比客观，我们需要知道，它们可能会使哪些其他引导公共讨论的哪些途径消失或不再流行。进一步说，我们希望，拒绝接受另一种“技术专家姿态”的程序员和工程师足够勇敢，捍卫自己对公共讨论如何展开的一贯见解。对公共辩论的本质采取假设是必然的（在设想哪些人会使用自己产品的时候，所有的设计师最终都需要选择一种弱化的见解)。然而，陶醉于互联网中心主义的我们，已经让太多设计师容易推卸了自己的责任。\n\n弥母产业让你名扬天下\n\n一旦我们开始留心数字过滤器和算法究竟如何运作，一旦我们弄清它们到底隐藏和揭露了什么，互联网中心主义的许多创世神话可能就再也站不住脚了。这类神话里有种观点认为，“在互联网”，思想象病毒一样传播，全凭自己的意志，最具病毒式传播特点的弥母(memes)(这些快速传播的文化单元的艺术术语)尤值一提。对公共话语来说，很少有比这种观点更有害的了。\n\n162\n\n枝术至死","previous_page":161,"next_page":163}