{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","title":"技术至死 数字化生存的阴暗面","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"0120136503","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","id":"13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","uuid":"13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","title":"技术至死 数字化生存的阴暗面","normalized_title":"技术至死数字化生存的阴暗面","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"0120136503","isbns":["0120136503","9787121227776"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":396,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E8%87%B3%E6%AD%BB%20%E6%95%B0%E5%AD%97%E5%8C%96%E7%94%9F%E5%AD%98%E7%9A%84%E9%98%B4%E6%9A%97%E9%9D%A2","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34/search"},"page":{"printed_page":164,"pdf_page":178,"physical_index":178,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"97c08b0e646c2dca29c6a666736a4f9a92dec0d323d8fd35d742e0cc4d1a81bd"},"chapter":"技术至死数字化生存的阴暗面","content":"弗格森在文章里提到的“自由派博客”中，有诺贝尔奖获得者、经济学家保罗·克鲁格曼(PaulKrugman)，有另一位著名经济学家、前政府官员布拉德·德隆(BradDe-Long)，还有前吉米·卡特总统的演讲撰稿人、著名记者詹姆斯·法洛斯(JamesFallows)。单凭他们用博客回应弗格森，就相信这些人拥有某种共同“博客”身份，认为它优先于他们的其他身份(如著名学者和公共知识分子），这就是最典型的互联网中心主义。干嘛不抨击他们都敲键盘或坐椅子？就连弗格森在回应里提到的安德鲁·苏利文(AndrewSullivan），也是个非常牵强的“博客”：哈佛大学博士，曾任《新共和》周刊编辑，苏利文是以资深保守派知识分子身份挑战弗格森的，而非穿着睡衣的“博客”。想象一下，如果“在线”和离线之间的鸿沟不存在，尼尔·弗格森立马就需要多花些心思羞辱他的批评者们了。“互联网”思想及与其有关的全部神话，通过这种方式侵蚀着公共讨论，导致了对偷懒捷径的滥用。\n\n公关行业从“在线”是个独立的知识空间这一提法中受益最多。它巧妙利用了这种数字二元性，把乏味的新闻稿打扮成自主生成的有趣“弥母”。麦迪逊广场和K街就靠着“在线”的方式，让传统媒体报道本来绝不会报道的人物、产品、问题和事件。如今，这种报道屡遭声讨，往往也正说明有太多“在线”网民在谈论它。\n\n看看2012年总统大选期间涌现出来的众多弥母吧，比如“看不见的奥巴马”(指演员克林特·伊斯特伍德在共和党全国代表大会上的表演)或“大鸟”\n\n164\n\n枝术至死","previous_page":163,"next_page":165}