{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","title":"技术至死 数字化生存的阴暗面","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"0120136503","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","id":"13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","uuid":"13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","title":"技术至死 数字化生存的阴暗面","normalized_title":"技术至死数字化生存的阴暗面","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"0120136503","isbns":["0120136503","9787121227776"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":396,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E8%87%B3%E6%AD%BB%20%E6%95%B0%E5%AD%97%E5%8C%96%E7%94%9F%E5%AD%98%E7%9A%84%E9%98%B4%E6%9A%97%E9%9D%A2","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34/search"},"page":{"printed_page":210,"pdf_page":224,"physical_index":224,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"cbaeeb276f9094b5b7644e411190a2ea421fdf8038494c494cc54218448a9068"},"chapter":"技术至死数字化生存的阴暗面","content":"“推搡”存在的另一问题更加阴险：只有当“推搡”让我们像监管机构预期的那样行动，它才管用。然而，在某种程度上，这可能需要“推搡”得使劲些（下手太轻了没用）—这就让人不可能不照着监管机构的期待去做了。或许，听到汽车发出警报声，提醒有乘客没系安全带，你仍然可以继续开车。可大多数人一定认为这很烦，会要求乘客把安全带系上。你大概以为这只是让监管机构修补了你的理性机制，而实际上，你根本是纵容他们借助“实用性机制”对你加以摆布了。\n\n道德日下的公民?\n\n在布朗索德看来，真正的问题并不在于技术机制取代了道德和理性机制。相反，问题在于，一旦技术里预设进了法律和规范，就很难质疑、修改它们了。它们几乎完全消失在了背景当中，令人感觉浑然一体；事实上，人们经常将之视为内置环境的扩展，而非某些聪明社会工程师故意计划出的结果。但如果我们希望生活在一个规范和法律不断进行修正、展开辩论的世界里，那么，或许我们应该对将这么多监管委托给技术的做法保持警惕。正如布朗索德所说，“道德社会需要对其承诺不断进行辩论。在这样的社会中，做一个技术管理下的被动监管对象没问题，但同样需要主动地发扬道德公民精神。”\n\n近一个世纪前，美国实用主义哲学家约翰·杜威(JohnDewey)根据对世界的亲身体验，写下有关修订现有理论(包括哪些事情属于道德，哪些不属于)之重要性的观点时，表达过类似的担忧（当然，布朗索德本人并未将自己的看法与杜威扯上关系)。在杜威看来，道德规则是“某种知识工具，有待通过据此行事而招致的后果，来对此进行检验、证实和修正。”因此，我们必须首先“诚实地承认道德情境的不确定性，以及道德规范在经受结果检验之前所具备的假设性质。”\n\n210\n\n枝术至死","previous_page":209,"next_page":211}