{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","title":"技术至死 数字化生存的阴暗面","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"0120136503","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","id":"13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","uuid":"13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","title":"技术至死 数字化生存的阴暗面","normalized_title":"技术至死数字化生存的阴暗面","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"0120136503","isbns":["0120136503","9787121227776"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":396,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E8%87%B3%E6%AD%BB%20%E6%95%B0%E5%AD%97%E5%8C%96%E7%94%9F%E5%AD%98%E7%9A%84%E9%98%B4%E6%9A%97%E9%9D%A2","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34/search"},"page":{"printed_page":227,"pdf_page":241,"physical_index":241,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"0201b523c468c4e3f70231533cf9ccad0f6831341ab6205cf64ec37b78c6820a"},"chapter":"技术至死数字化生存的阴暗面","content":"凯利的分析里并未出现任何有关分配的讨论。他没有讨论该由谁去吹奏亚里士多德的长笛8是富有的人吗？有才华的人？还是随机分配?一凯利设想，技术会生产出足够的长笛，分配自然也就不成为问题了。和彼得·戴曼迪斯一样，在凯利描绘的世界里，技术保证了丰裕，一旦达到了丰裕状态，对资源的争夺也就不必要了。这种对人性的解读方法似乎太过浅薄，因为要是人人都有了长笛，肯定有人想要两支，哪怕单纯是为了跟邻居显摆也好。如果缺失了强健稳定的政治制度，丰裕毫无意义。\n\n凯利想法里最令人不安的地方是(他在诸多技术专家中相当具有代表性)，他是跳出地方社群、甚至民族国家的范畴进行思考的。他的赛场是整个人类，整个宇宙。这种哲学观，用“宏观主义”(macroscopism)来形容最合适：从如何满足整个人类需求的角度来分析一切事情。因此，如果地方社群选择限制某种技术，或对其加以彻底禁止，就等于是从人类手里偷了东西。按照同样的逻辑，欧洲人简直阻碍了人类前进的各种可能性，因为他们规范转基因食品，还有着更严格的环保标准。用冠冕堂皇的全球正义说辞，打压现有地方性实践的意义和回旋空间，这只是诸多例子中的一个罢了。\n\n8亚里士多德的长笛，指的是亚里士多德对公平与争议的讨论。亚里士多德曾提问说，如果有一支最好的长笛，应该分配给什么人呢?是出价最高的人?社会地位最高的人?还是最有权力的人?亚里士多德的答案是:应分配给最擅长吹奏长笛的人。\n\n更少犯罪，更多惩戒\n\n227","previous_page":226,"next_page":228}