{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","title":"技术至死 数字化生存的阴暗面","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"0120136503","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","id":"13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","uuid":"13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","title":"技术至死 数字化生存的阴暗面","normalized_title":"技术至死数字化生存的阴暗面","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"0120136503","isbns":["0120136503","9787121227776"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":396,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E8%87%B3%E6%AD%BB%20%E6%95%B0%E5%AD%97%E5%8C%96%E7%94%9F%E5%AD%98%E7%9A%84%E9%98%B4%E6%9A%97%E9%9D%A2","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34/search"},"page":{"printed_page":332,"pdf_page":346,"physical_index":346,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"441acc64bef3e93360275e9a71f2e576a40f03ebac474661d2a2f6abd5772636"},"chapter":"技术至死数字化生存的阴暗面","content":"一家靠着广告（《广告狂人》里像唐·德拉普这样的骗子手对广告这个行业可是如鱼得水呢)赚钱的公司发动了一场追求可靠性的现代十字军东征，不免太过讽刺。文学批评家莱昂纳尔·特里林（LionelTrilling)在《诚与真》(Sincerity andAuthenticity)中指出，这场东征其实并不新鲜，可追溯回莎士比亚时代。但特里林还有一点说得很对：真实可靠或许有好处，但故意把自己塑造成一个真诚的人，这种做法没什么好钦佩的。对可靠性(证明自己不光善良，而且还真诚，对自己真诚，对自己的本性真诚，甚至，对人类应该是怎么样的概念真诚)的简单冲动，是完全失真的。\n\n特里林警告，我们不应当把真实性误以为是“某一种衣服，退色的牛仔裤，或者一种脚踏实地的外貌，”因为“一旦你开始重视时尚或者时尚符号的道德意义，一旦这种意义……成了某种人要求得到尊重的标志，”那么真实性立刻就失去价值了。当然，我们也不必把谴责提升到德国哲学家西奥多·阿多诺(TheodorAdorno)那个地步。阿多诺在《真实性的隐语》(JargonofAuthenticity)抱怨说，“打着当代真实性的名号，哪怕是施加酷刑的拷打者也穿上一层美妙的外衣：只需要说他是个真正的拷打者就够了。”但是阿多诺确实说对了一点：真实的东西不一定就是道义上的好，道义上的好，也不一定需要真实。我们的真实，和具体的事情也有关系。哲学家查尔斯·吉尼翁(CharlesGuignon)说得好，“真实性的关键不光在于承诺的强度，表达承诺的热情度，更在于承诺内容的性质。”\n\n此外，在Facebook手里，真实性成了一种修辞武器，助长用户的焦虑，并进而向该网站上传更多的数据。谢丽尔·桑德伯格说Facebook的个人资料如今是“表达我们真实身份”的“详尽个人肖像”，其实也是在指出：只有上传、分享更多的细节，才能让这样的肖像更真实。但要是Facebook不暗中对用户动手脚的话，它也就不是Facebook了。故此，它信奉“无障碍分享”\n\n332\n\n枝术至死","previous_page":331,"next_page":333}