{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","title":"技术至死 数字化生存的阴暗面","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"0120136503","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","id":"13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","uuid":"13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","title":"技术至死 数字化生存的阴暗面","normalized_title":"技术至死数字化生存的阴暗面","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"0120136503","isbns":["0120136503","9787121227776"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":396,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E8%87%B3%E6%AD%BB%20%E6%95%B0%E5%AD%97%E5%8C%96%E7%94%9F%E5%AD%98%E7%9A%84%E9%98%B4%E6%9A%97%E9%9D%A2","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34/search"},"page":{"printed_page":336,"pdf_page":350,"physical_index":350,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"449ac77c6f81bc6fefaaa6ef705295c6e963e45762c7cff9cad7ca1ffab9e341"},"chapter":"技术至死数字化生存的阴暗面","content":"许多人甚至挺欢迎这两项变化。干嘛不阻止那些想要欺骗系统、逾期停车的人呢？毕竟，免费停车场其实并不免费呀。洛杉矶加州大学城市规划教授唐纳德·舒普(Donald Shoup)在《免费停车的高昂代价》(The High Cost ofFreeParking)中指出，如果人们按照公平市场价格支付停车费，有可能会减少开车，而始终处于缺少经费状态的城市则可以筹集更多的现金。看起来就像是双赢啊。\n\n但是我们应该考虑圣莫尼卡市举措的其他方面吗?回到阿尔伯特·赫希曼的“无用、悖谬及危害”理论上，第一点似乎不成为问题。除非司机能找到一种方式轻松地规避智能计费系统，要不然，他们一般会遵照执行；说这个方案徒劳无益，并没有很好的理由至少眼下没有。至于说悖谬，也很难证实：以智能传感器为基础的计价应该无法恶化停车局面。\n\n那么危害这一点呢?用赫希曼的话来说，智能计价系统危及到了“从前某项珍贵的成就”吗？当然，这里可以套用与情境犯罪预防相关的标准批评，第六章我们已经详尽介绍过。也许，如果我们将这套方案推而广之，禁止公民到处违反法律，反而会损害公民的道德感，不用技术性的基础设施明确地剥夺他们做错误事情的机会，他们就不会去做正确的事情。\n\n有没有可能，自动复位的计价器破坏了司机们之间的团结纽带，剥夺了一些人施展善行的机会，同时让另一些人确信：世界是一个彻底分裂化的世界，没有利他行为的存在空间?这种担忧乍看起来颇有道理，但似乎建立在错误的逻辑上，因为表面上的“善行”(在计价器里留下预付时段，方便下一个人停车)其实主要是出于利己的原因，尤其是离开的司机先前以为自己会待得更久。有人会得益于前一位司机的慷慨，主要是系统设计部完善所致—而并不是要离开停车位的这名司机，故意要让随便哪一位使用同一台计价器的陌生人受惠。\n\n336\n\n枝术至死","previous_page":335,"next_page":337}