{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","title":"技术至死 数字化生存的阴暗面","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"0120136503","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","id":"13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","uuid":"13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","title":"技术至死 数字化生存的阴暗面","normalized_title":"技术至死数字化生存的阴暗面","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"0120136503","isbns":["0120136503","9787121227776"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":396,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E8%87%B3%E6%AD%BB%20%E6%95%B0%E5%AD%97%E5%8C%96%E7%94%9F%E5%AD%98%E7%9A%84%E9%98%B4%E6%9A%97%E9%9D%A2","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34/search"},"page":{"printed_page":43,"pdf_page":57,"physical_index":57,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"fddfce6e42eb0dcd2362fcd63e156c5013ac349471757347ad13de48fbe4cb45"},"chapter":"技术至死数字化生存的阴暗面","content":"温伯格说，“知识是如今网络的属性。”非也非也，知识一直都是网络的属性，粗略地考察12世纪的第一代大学就能看出来。又一次，我们的数字狂热者把体积与秩序方面叹为观止的有趣变化，误解为新时代的降临，旧规则不再适用。或者，正如一位富有见地的批评家对温伯格的作品发表意见所指出，温伯格混淆了“网络体系结构的变化与网络化知识本身的来临”。“互联网”不是网络化知识的原因，而是它的结果，大多数互联网理论家都遗忘了这个见解。\n\n但是温伯格的解释更令人困扰的地方在于，它试图把“互联网”从它所体现的复杂社会技术关系中分割出来，用它自己的方式来进行分析，就好像它是从天而降的东西，没有任何的历史渊源或联系。这是当代互联网言论反复出现的特征(也是庸俗麦克卢汉主义的又一实例)，因为它让其从业者得以将“互联网”(按乐观的说法，互联网是当代一切进步事物的化身，悲观的说法则恰与此相反)与一些社会力量或群体放到同等地位，不管是主流媒体、好莱坞、独裁者还是持不同政见者。只有切断“互联网”与其语境的联系，将其呈现为麦克卢汉式的“媒介”，才能进行简化记分（也即判断“互联网”对这件或那件事情是好是坏的无尽游戏)。\n\n是到了结束这场记分游戏的时候了，因为除了混乱它什么也没有带来。记分游戏促使温伯格写道，“就在互联网’因为各种问题而受到责难的同时，像Politifact.com这样的网站正在对新闻媒体进行比以往更加严密的事实审查。”“互联网”得一分？毕竟Politifact.com是个网站，而网站在分类上属于“互联网”这一方。这简直傻透了：Politifact.com也许是个网站，但它也是老牌报业《坦帕湾时报》(Tampa BayTimes)的一个项目。是的，我们应当谈谈被新技术变成现实的新形式的事实审查，但是若臆想好歹Politifact.com总归告诉了我们一些关于“互联网”本性的有趣事情(在某一刻还以为这种本性真的存在)，那就真的大错特错了。\n\n互联网什么也没告诉我们\n\n043","previous_page":42,"next_page":44}