{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","title":"技术至死 数字化生存的阴暗面","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"0120136503","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","id":"13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","uuid":"13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","title":"技术至死 数字化生存的阴暗面","normalized_title":"技术至死数字化生存的阴暗面","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"0120136503","isbns":["0120136503","9787121227776"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":396,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E8%87%B3%E6%AD%BB%20%E6%95%B0%E5%AD%97%E5%8C%96%E7%94%9F%E5%AD%98%E7%9A%84%E9%98%B4%E6%9A%97%E9%9D%A2","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/13a8d12f-fb2c-4d05-a501-68bf7c192d34/search"},"page":{"printed_page":88,"pdf_page":102,"physical_index":102,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"0f199b5b25b5c0f7fb64b50d8c081aa7a34683722cab582fa09bd28302627861"},"chapter":"技术至死数字化生存的阴暗面","content":"另一组心理学研究则发现，当众表明自己的最初立场之后，我们不大可能通过随后的审议改变想法，因为我们希望自己被看作是前后一致的决策者。詹姆斯·麦迪逊5(JamesMadison)在1787年美国制宪会议上就曾表达过对审议环境的这种担忧，他说，“如果成员一开始就公开表态，那么他们以后就会认为，一贯性要求他们必须坚持自己的立场，而如果采用秘密讨论的方式，人一旦发现自己不再认可先前意见的正当性和真实性，会对他人意见保持开放，不认为自己有义务捍卫立场。”换句话说，追求透明性是有代价的，有时这些代价可能远远超过了预期收益，大多数时候找不出合适的理由要以增加透明性为名牺牲审议质量。\n\n透明性和信任之间的关系也相当复杂。在多种透明性方案为何会侵犯(而非增强)信任这个问题上，哲学家欧诺拉·奥尼尔6(Onora’Neill)一直是一个特别敏锐的观察者。在奥尼尔看来，培养信任是一个比促进透明性更重要的公共目标，如果后者损害了前者，或许我们就应当克制自己对网络和数据库世界必然势头的热情。奥尼尔写道，“透明性增加，可能会造成洪水一般未经分类的信息和错误信息，除非对其进行分类和评估，否则它们带来的恐怕只有混乱。这可能会增加不确定性而非信任……透明性可能会鼓励人们不再那么诚实，从而会增加欺骗，减少信任的理由；人要是知道自己所说或所写的一切都将公诸于众，便可能篡改实情。”\n\n5美国第四任总统。他是最后一位去世的美国开国之父。\n\n6 剑桥大学Newnham学院院长，著名的康德哲学专家，主要研究伦理学和政治哲学。\n\n088\n\n枝术至死","previous_page":87,"next_page":89}