{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"1a676215-c308-4904-8f41-c02fdedc5614","title":"Fully Automated Luxury Communism A Manifesto","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"1a676215-c308-4904-8f41-c02fdedc5614","id":"1a676215-c308-4904-8f41-c02fdedc5614","uuid":"1a676215-c308-4904-8f41-c02fdedc5614","title":"Fully Automated Luxury Communism A Manifesto","normalized_title":"fullyautomatedluxurycommunismamanifesto","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":88,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/1a676215-c308-4904-8f41-c02fdedc5614","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/Fully%20Automated%20Luxury%20Communism%20A%20Manifesto","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/1a676215-c308-4904-8f41-c02fdedc5614/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/1a676215-c308-4904-8f41-c02fdedc5614/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/1a676215-c308-4904-8f41-c02fdedc5614","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/1a676215-c308-4904-8f41-c02fdedc5614/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/1a676215-c308-4904-8f41-c02fdedc5614/search"},"page":{"printed_page":203,"pdf_page":12,"physical_index":12,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"2fb83474d000ce1bb844033977cfc4b4ce05a08d0f0dfde04422c466443557c9"},"chapter":"这不是1917年","content":"在英国成为全球第二大外包市场之际，该公司与Serco、索迪斯(Sodexo)、Capita和G4S等类似公司一道，对工资构成了下行压力。\n\n当务之急是推动公共部门(尤其是地方政府)的削减，同时展示私营部门的优势，这些公司在转移数十万个工作岗位的过程中发挥了关键作用，同时减少了工人的工资。事实上，2010年之后英国私营部门的就业“奇迹”之所以成为可能，完全是因为外包。然而，它的成功却与不断下降的工资、不断上升的在职贫困和停滞不前的生产力紧密相连。\n\nCarillion破产的惊人速度表明，外包在其默认设置下是如何使工人陷入贫困的，更糟糕的是，它可能导致整个经济部门的混乱。这不仅会危及关键服务和基础设施的提供，而且还会危及不稳定的工人。更重要的是，像Carillion这样的跨国公司有效地利用公共资金加剧了当地的贫困，同时为其他地方的公司股东提供回报—一通常是在更大、更富裕的城市。这种模式不仅在迫使工资下降方面非常有效，而且在确保资本以前所未有的方式撤离落后的城镇方面也非常有效。因此，它对收入不平等和地区不平等都负有责任。\n\n然而，尽管Carillion的倒闭证明了外包的有害逻辑，但它也无法与英国东海岸干线(通过铁路连接爱丁堡和伦敦的首府)发生的蠢事相提并论。2009年，当其运营商Stagecoach表示，在经济衰退的背景下，利润率太低时，carillion重新回归公有制\n\nFundamental Principles\n\n203","previous_page":202,"next_page":204}