{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"1a676215-c308-4904-8f41-c02fdedc5614","title":"Fully Automated Luxury Communism A Manifesto","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"1a676215-c308-4904-8f41-c02fdedc5614","id":"1a676215-c308-4904-8f41-c02fdedc5614","uuid":"1a676215-c308-4904-8f41-c02fdedc5614","title":"Fully Automated Luxury Communism A Manifesto","normalized_title":"fullyautomatedluxurycommunismamanifesto","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":88,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/1a676215-c308-4904-8f41-c02fdedc5614","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/Fully%20Automated%20Luxury%20Communism%20A%20Manifesto","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/1a676215-c308-4904-8f41-c02fdedc5614/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/1a676215-c308-4904-8f41-c02fdedc5614/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/1a676215-c308-4904-8f41-c02fdedc5614","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/1a676215-c308-4904-8f41-c02fdedc5614/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/1a676215-c308-4904-8f41-c02fdedc5614/search"},"page":{"printed_page":204,"pdf_page":13,"physical_index":13,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"c525ea68fc00048486cef037de44a2419fef1e42623d7d75172fb9ff7c731bea"},"chapter":"这不是1917年","content":"随后，它成为了卓越的灯塔，赢得了12个行业奖项，而与任何私营运营商相比，它需要的政府投资占总收入的比例最低。是的，你没看错:唯一一家公有化的铁路供应商需要的纳税人资金比任何一家私营公司都少。不出所料，尽管运行异常良好，但东海岸线在2013年被重新私有化。这是在2018年它不得不再次“暂时”重新国有化之前，因为尽管有补贴，但它未能为私人所有者盈利。虽然东海岸干线的故事几乎是有趣的，但悲剧的是，这个笑话是在我们身上开的。\n\n因此，因为英国的私人铁路供应商，就像它的外包公司一样，只不过是旨在以牺牲工人和服务用户为代价为股东榨取价值的机器。麦克纳尔蒂2011年发表的报告得出结论，英国铁路公司收取的票价在欧洲是最离谱的，与欧洲大陆的国有铁路供应商相比，英国铁路公司的票价高出40%。\n\n当某些政客说这个系统被“操纵”时，他们的话之所以能引起共鸣，是因为当涉及到越来越多的公共服务被私有化和外包时，他们所说的准确地描述了日常现实。私有化不是为了改善结果或服务，而是追求一种政治议程，将财富从社会大多数人手中重新分配给一小部分精英。这甚至不是“自由市场”，而是将市场资本主义最糟糕的特征与国家社会主义结合在一起的一种奇怪的混合体。\n\n204\n\nparadise found","previous_page":203,"next_page":205}