{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"1a676215-c308-4904-8f41-c02fdedc5614","title":"Fully Automated Luxury Communism A Manifesto","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"1a676215-c308-4904-8f41-c02fdedc5614","id":"1a676215-c308-4904-8f41-c02fdedc5614","uuid":"1a676215-c308-4904-8f41-c02fdedc5614","title":"Fully Automated Luxury Communism A Manifesto","normalized_title":"fullyautomatedluxurycommunismamanifesto","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":88,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/1a676215-c308-4904-8f41-c02fdedc5614","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/Fully%20Automated%20Luxury%20Communism%20A%20Manifesto","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/1a676215-c308-4904-8f41-c02fdedc5614/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/1a676215-c308-4904-8f41-c02fdedc5614/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/1a676215-c308-4904-8f41-c02fdedc5614","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/1a676215-c308-4904-8f41-c02fdedc5614/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/1a676215-c308-4904-8f41-c02fdedc5614/search"},"page":{"printed_page":227,"pdf_page":36,"physical_index":36,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"ac98c6f65ddca2e234a1259ee77b76950448a91454c4f05976cbbc5693c78ba0"},"chapter":"这不是1917年","content":"计划，臭名昭著的国家计划机构是苏联经济生活的核心相比之下，现代资本主义经济是“自由的”，自主行为者参与市场交换，以最大限度地提高自己的利益，幸运的是，也促进了普遍福利。\n\n只是事实并非如此。从沃尔玛到亚马逊，中央计划是“自由市场”经济的一个重要特征。然而，这方面的主要场所是央行，它们的决定——尽管声称是公正的技术官僚一一是基于通胀、就业和资产价格等政治优先事项。私人银行在较小的规模上做着类似的事情，决定哪些项目可以获得社会资源的份额，并对那些亏损的项目实施“市场判断”。\n\n宣称央行“独立”——本世纪头十年资本主义现实主义鼎盛时期的一项受青睐的政策—一是一种荒谬的猜测，就像历史本身的终结一样。在这里，现代资本主义经济中的关键角色，他们做出特定的选择，以牺牲其他群体的利益为代价，使某些群体享有特权，他们认为自己是中立的，“常识”而不是意识形态占主导地位。\n\n除了强调央行的决策本身具有深刻的政治性这一事实外，追求FALC的人的目标应该是公开支持政治银行业务。而不是加入“结束美联储”的呼声，这是一个在自由主义右翼中越来越频繁听到的短语，回应应该是相反的:要求现代资本主义核心的意向性的，有意识的计划被重新用于对社会有益的目的，而不是对社会有害的目的。英格兰银行(Bank ofEngland)和美联储(fed)与苏联的国家计划(Gosplan)有许多共同之处，这应该成为政治希望的基础，而不应被哀叹为阻碍了这一神话般的操作\n\nReforging the Capitalist State\n\n227","previous_page":226,"next_page":228}