{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"1a676215-c308-4904-8f41-c02fdedc5614","title":"Fully Automated Luxury Communism A Manifesto","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"1a676215-c308-4904-8f41-c02fdedc5614","id":"1a676215-c308-4904-8f41-c02fdedc5614","uuid":"1a676215-c308-4904-8f41-c02fdedc5614","title":"Fully Automated Luxury Communism A Manifesto","normalized_title":"fullyautomatedluxurycommunismamanifesto","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":88,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/1a676215-c308-4904-8f41-c02fdedc5614","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/Fully%20Automated%20Luxury%20Communism%20A%20Manifesto","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/1a676215-c308-4904-8f41-c02fdedc5614/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/1a676215-c308-4904-8f41-c02fdedc5614/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/1a676215-c308-4904-8f41-c02fdedc5614","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/1a676215-c308-4904-8f41-c02fdedc5614/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/1a676215-c308-4904-8f41-c02fdedc5614/search"},"page":{"printed_page":234,"pdf_page":43,"physical_index":43,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"3a303d33a0731f1792395d506e9a3518ed038236c62a76b80c6af5900ab8ca90"},"chapter":"这不是1917年","content":"但是，如果不是数字技术无法提高生产率，而是它们带来的变化如此重大，以至于需要一种新的衡量成功的方法，那会怎么样呢?如果我们只是处于一场深刻的经济转型的开端，随着第三次中断的继续展开，GDP将被证明越来越无法捕捉所有正在创造的价值，那该怎么办?\n\n我认为，这种情况正在发生。极端的供给正导致许多行业出现通缩，第三次中断(Third Disruption)正在蒸发大量GDP。随着越来越多的行业生产商品和服务的边际成本趋近于零，其结果是将发生更自由、更非市场的交易。即使市场能够做出反应，并将某些商品保持在价格机制之内——正如Spotify的租赁模式作为对数字文件共享的回应所证明的那样——极端的供应仍然意味着净流动量的减少。如今，很少有人会为一张音乐专辑支付15英镑，而在20年前，全球北方的每个人都认为这是理所当然的。这就解释了为什么在音乐产业开始数字化20年后，尽管Spotify和Tidal等流媒体服务越来越受欢迎，但市场的价值仍然小得多。1999年，音乐产业在美国创造的收入约为146亿美元，到2016年，这一数字已降至76.5亿美元—一这还没有考虑到通货膨胀。\n\n按照我们对GDP的传统理解，这些数字应该意味着灾难一一反映出听自己喜欢的音乐家的人比以前少了。但事实恰恰相反。信息产品的极度供给一—音乐就是一个典型的例子——意味着更多的人比以往任何时候都听更多的音乐，它只是没有出现在我们认为最重要的数字上。\n\n234\n\nparadise found","previous_page":233,"next_page":235}