{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"1c434b75-5c8d-4d6d-a718-ffbe4846c04a","title":"否定的辩证法","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208161849","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"1c434b75-5c8d-4d6d-a718-ffbe4846c04a","id":"1c434b75-5c8d-4d6d-a718-ffbe4846c04a","uuid":"1c434b75-5c8d-4d6d-a718-ffbe4846c04a","title":"否定的辩证法","normalized_title":"否定的辩证法","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208161849","isbns":["9787208161849"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":378,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/1c434b75-5c8d-4d6d-a718-ffbe4846c04a","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%90%A6%E5%AE%9A%E7%9A%84%E8%BE%A9%E8%AF%81%E6%B3%95","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/1c434b75-5c8d-4d6d-a718-ffbe4846c04a/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/1c434b75-5c8d-4d6d-a718-ffbe4846c04a/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/1c434b75-5c8d-4d6d-a718-ffbe4846c04a","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/1c434b75-5c8d-4d6d-a718-ffbe4846c04a/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/1c434b75-5c8d-4d6d-a718-ffbe4846c04a/search"},"page":{"printed_page":106,"pdf_page":128,"physical_index":128,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"50d9b5bae8d8e6d534830f7f0252c74f231624134cfad1d6fed748b0759851e0"},"chapter":"第二章 存在与实存","content":"“定在本身是本体论的”\n\n尽管克尔凯郭尔以唯名论的方式唆使实存反对本质，如同利用神学的武器反对形而上学一样，但他的确根据人是按上帝的形象被创造出来的教义，在直接个体的意义上给实存一种象征的特性。他抨击本体论，但本体论的属性却被存在物所吸收在定在的领域，被“这种个体”所吸收。在《存在与时间》中对实存的拔高同《走向死亡的疾病》的初始反思中的拔高几乎没有差别。意识克尔凯郭尔的主体的“透明性”对于使实存本体论化来说是合法的权威：“定在能以这样或那样的方式与之相关并且无论如何总要与之相关的那种存在，我们叫作实存’。”更确切地说：“定在本身是本体论的’，因为它把实存作为它的规定性。”\n\n主体性的概念像存在的概念一样不稳定，所以它可以任意地根据存在的概念来调音。它的模糊性使得海德格尔把定在等同于存在的一种存在方式，使得他靠分析来清除本体论的差别。定在由于其时空的个性而被叫作实体的，而本体论的则是逻各斯。海德格尔从定在向存在推论的暖昧之处，在于他关于定在“先于一切别的存在物”的“复杂在先性”的谈论中所蕴含的“同时性”。主体被意识所决定；而意识不能与之分离的它的另一方面出于某种理由并不是被充分意识的，它不是透明的和“本体论的”。\n\n否定的辩证法\n\n106","previous_page":105,"next_page":107}