{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"1c434b75-5c8d-4d6d-a718-ffbe4846c04a","title":"否定的辩证法","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208161849","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"1c434b75-5c8d-4d6d-a718-ffbe4846c04a","id":"1c434b75-5c8d-4d6d-a718-ffbe4846c04a","uuid":"1c434b75-5c8d-4d6d-a718-ffbe4846c04a","title":"否定的辩证法","normalized_title":"否定的辩证法","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208161849","isbns":["9787208161849"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":378,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/1c434b75-5c8d-4d6d-a718-ffbe4846c04a","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%90%A6%E5%AE%9A%E7%9A%84%E8%BE%A9%E8%AF%81%E6%B3%95","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/1c434b75-5c8d-4d6d-a718-ffbe4846c04a/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/1c434b75-5c8d-4d6d-a718-ffbe4846c04a/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/1c434b75-5c8d-4d6d-a718-ffbe4846c04a","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/1c434b75-5c8d-4d6d-a718-ffbe4846c04a/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/1c434b75-5c8d-4d6d-a718-ffbe4846c04a/search"},"page":{"printed_page":121,"pdf_page":142,"physical_index":142,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"55db305f17df5ef1ec3989414390602686f0033ae04267cb571eed6ab94c87ae"},"chapter":"第二章 存在与实存","content":"人们不能向外看。在彼岸存在的东西只是在物质和范畴内显现出来的。据此便把康德哲学的真理和非真理区分开来了。就康德哲学破除了关于绝对的直接知识的幻想而言，它是真实的；就其用一种模式来描绘这种绝对，而这种模式与一种仿佛是知识原型的直接意识相应而言，它又是不真实的。对这种非真理的证明就是康德之后的唯心主义的真理。然而，就其把主观中介的真理和自在的主体相等同而言，康德之后的唯心主义又成了不真实的仿佛主体的纯粹概念和存在是一回事。\n\n无矛盾性不应被实在化\n\n这种思索看起来似乎是悖论性的。解释主观性、思维本身的不是它自己，而是事实特别是社会事实。但认识的客观性反过来又被说成是不能离开思维、离开主观性而存在。这种悖论出自笛卡尔的解释规范：后来的东西-至少在逻辑上是后来的东西一的根据应到以前的东西中去寻找。这种规范不再是约束性的。如用它来衡量，辩证的事实陈述便是显而易见的逻辑矛盾。但这种事实陈述不能用从外部召来的、等级的次序图式来解释。否则，解释的尝试就要以有待发现的解释为先决条件，它就要以无矛盾性即主观的思维原则为先决条件，把这种原则当作内在于应被思考的客体之中的东西。\n\n第二部分 否定的辩证法概念和范畴\n\n121","previous_page":120,"next_page":122}