{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"1c434b75-5c8d-4d6d-a718-ffbe4846c04a","title":"否定的辩证法","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208161849","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"1c434b75-5c8d-4d6d-a718-ffbe4846c04a","id":"1c434b75-5c8d-4d6d-a718-ffbe4846c04a","uuid":"1c434b75-5c8d-4d6d-a718-ffbe4846c04a","title":"否定的辩证法","normalized_title":"否定的辩证法","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208161849","isbns":["9787208161849"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":378,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/1c434b75-5c8d-4d6d-a718-ffbe4846c04a","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%90%A6%E5%AE%9A%E7%9A%84%E8%BE%A9%E8%AF%81%E6%B3%95","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/1c434b75-5c8d-4d6d-a718-ffbe4846c04a/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/1c434b75-5c8d-4d6d-a718-ffbe4846c04a/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/1c434b75-5c8d-4d6d-a718-ffbe4846c04a","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/1c434b75-5c8d-4d6d-a718-ffbe4846c04a/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/1c434b75-5c8d-4d6d-a718-ffbe4846c04a/search"},"page":{"printed_page":273,"pdf_page":292,"physical_index":292,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"9c1c3e4c18dd65a97efda7c117b2b2011914045d8f8f8a46feab644ba0bca22c"},"chapter":"第二章 世界精神与自然历史—有关黑格尔的题外话","content":"世界精神本身开动了主观主义顽固不化的科学观念，这种科学观念旨在建立一种自给自足的、经验的一理性的科学体系，而不是为了理解一个本身客观的、自上而下被操纵的社会。一度起批判启蒙作用的对自在之物的反叛，已经成了对认识的破坏，即使在最畸形的科学概念形态中还幸存有同样畸形的事物的痕迹。康德在关于模糊意义的章节中拒不打算了解事物的内在性质，这是培根纲领的终极理性。事物内在性质的真理性的历史标志是对经院教条的反叛。然而，在它禁止认识的东西是认识的认识论前提和现实前提的地方，在认识的主体必须把自身反思为认识的普遍性的一个要素同时又不完全等同于这种普遍性的地方，这种动机便破灭了。\n\n阻止主体从内部认识它寓于其中的事物和它在其中有自己的全部内在性质的事物，是荒谬的。就此而言，黑格尔的唯心主义比康德更现实主义。当科学的概念形态既和它的事实性的理想相冲突，又和简单理性的理想相冲突时，当它以理性的反思辨的执行者而自居时，它的机制就成了非理性。方法独断专行地取代了它应该认识的东西。实证主义关于内在一致的、无矛盾的、逻辑上无懈可击的模型的认识理想是站不住脚的。其原因在于应被认识的东西具有内在矛盾，客体具有对抗性。这种对抗是社会的普遍性与特殊性的对抗，而方法却先于一切内容否认了这种对抗。\n\n第二章 世界精神与自然历史一有关黑格尔的题外话\n\n273","previous_page":272,"next_page":274}