{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","title":"德勒兹关键概念","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787568912952","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","id":"1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","uuid":"1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","title":"德勒兹关键概念","normalized_title":"德勒兹关键概念","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787568912952","isbns":["9787568912952","9781844652884"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":409,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%BE%B7%E5%8B%92%E5%85%B9%E5%85%B3%E9%94%AE%E6%A6%82%E5%BF%B5","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08/search"},"page":{"printed_page":104,"pdf_page":118,"physical_index":118,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"40fecd2cc882ab8b5df6c49cf34d1c66a5b5623138529ac408795355ab891036"},"chapter":"德勒兹：关键概念 （原书第2版）","content":"在本文中，我们无意提供对《意义的逻辑》的整体性阅读(即便我们有能力这么做)，尽管此时我们已经仔细地处理了和“第八个级数:结构”(Eighth Series of Structure)这一章的结尾相对应的文本。我们现在打算的是，展示德勒兹的意义和级数概念在他的其他工作领域，甚至在某些文本—《意义的逻辑》的术语在其中已经转换成了不同的语域(registers)—中的运作方式。我们只能探究两个这样的语域，一个是神学的领域(the domain of theology)，另一个是根茎的领域(the domain of rhizomatics)。\n\n对我们而言，首先出现的问题是：如果意义/级数的概念消除了以陈述为代表的表象性思维(representational thinking)，而且开创了一种对结构的新的理解，那这个概念如何在神学的领域中产生共振呢？我们在上面已经摆明了，德勒兹试图超越的那种语言陈述模式是和一种理念论逻辑(an idealist logic)牵连在一起的，在这种逻辑中，差异服从于同一性或共同性，身体服从于理念。而且，德勒兹宣称，理智和常识—那种语言陈述模式的孪生的基础—集结了诸多力量为自我、世界和上帝的“联盟”奠基，因为根据表象的观念(doxa)，上帝是“一切趋向的最终出路[理智]和同一性的最高原则[常识]”（LS：78)。他还在别的地方写到他称之为“上帝的秩序”(order of (od)的那种东西，强调这种秩序是通过：\n\n104\n\n德勒兹：关键概念(原书第2版)\n\n73","previous_page":null,"next_page":105}