{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","title":"德勒兹关键概念","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787568912952","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","id":"1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","uuid":"1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","title":"德勒兹关键概念","normalized_title":"德勒兹关键概念","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787568912952","isbns":["9787568912952","9781844652884"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":409,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%BE%B7%E5%8B%92%E5%85%B9%E5%85%B3%E9%94%AE%E6%A6%82%E5%BF%B5","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08/search"},"page":{"printed_page":152,"pdf_page":166,"physical_index":166,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"1c7f8f4d32aa53c30cca3e280166260dac6e1069bc57c68cdee374e4a040a980"},"chapter":"德勒兹：关键概念 （原书第2版）","content":"同样模糊不清的“具体的普遍性（权力、反抗、资本、劳动）”(DeLanda2008：177)：我们需要一种直接交战的“分析学”(analytics)(Foucault1978：82)。德勒兹和加塔利通过他们对微观政治(the micropolitical)和宏观政治(the macropolitical)的区分为我们提供了这样一种分析学。\n\n在《千高原》中，“微观政治和节段性”（Micropolitics andSegmentarity)这座高原通过本体论的形式展示了这种分析学，它解释了实在界(the Real)各部分的组分(comnponents)和性质，还有它们的关系。对于德勒兹和加塔利来说，实在界—包括社会、个人(“现实”[the actual])和虚拟(the virtual)—完全是由线(lines)和节段(segments)构成的。本体论是制图学(cartography)，即对那些线的研究，也是一门政治学(politics)，即“对每一条线的风险的研究”(ATP：227)。这项“研究”是——或至少打算激发起——对当下的介入(intervention)，它和理解那些线及那些风险的本质，理解那些线和风险在特定领域中如何运作是同步的。因此，我用“微观政治学”来指称三种可能的事物：(i)对线和诸多参照系统的仔细考察，它们可以作为一种解释学用于调查和行动的领域；(ii)对断裂的实践的关注，一种线或节段—分子(molecular)—和一种装置——变化的抽象机器—尤其胜任这种实践；(iii)一种介入的模式，德勒兹和加塔利认为它不同于所谓“宏观政治”且比它更为合适。改革的自由民主计划—例如把伊拉克“民主化”—是后者的一个好例子。微观政治的介入并不自外于，也不限于通常被认为是“政治”的那些操作性表演(例如选举和草拟宪法)。它是一种实实在在的可能性，反现实化(counter-actualization)的可能性，伴随着整个实在界领域。实践一种微观政治可能要涉及这三个方面的全部。“微观政治和节段”这座高原把这三个方面全部都卷了进去。\n\n152\n\n德勒兹：关键概念(原书第2版)","previous_page":null,"next_page":153}