{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","title":"德勒兹关键概念","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787568912952","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","id":"1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","uuid":"1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","title":"德勒兹关键概念","normalized_title":"德勒兹关键概念","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787568912952","isbns":["9787568912952","9781844652884"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":409,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%BE%B7%E5%8B%92%E5%85%B9%E5%85%B3%E9%94%AE%E6%A6%82%E5%BF%B5","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08/search"},"page":{"printed_page":157,"pdf_page":171,"physical_index":171,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"ff57971d137fa46cc5b74136b031e2fcbcfc5ffb07316133c472218be6bf5d6b"},"chapter":"德勒兹：关键概念 （原书第2版）","content":"被施加和被引人到这种树形系统中的变化—无论是重大的还是轻微的—倾向于制造量的而非质的改变。同性恋权利活动家为了赢得合法婚姻而发起的挑战宪章运动(Charter challenges)，会带来更多已婚人士，但对制度及婚姻的“性质”不会有任何根本的改变。宏观政治系统所“射出”的，是“被确定为它们的实体、形式和关系的僵化的节段”(ATP：212)。存在着“一种倾向，即只通过一种绝对的标准或先在的同一性的立场来认识和评价差异”(Patton 2000：47)。相反，微观政治装置“射出”的是“基于存在的变化”(exsitential mutations)。这些“质的多样性”中固有的差异并非次要的或派生的。它是“差异本身”(diffcrence as such)：一种联结、结合、中断或断裂，它并没有确定或提供一种连续性；相反，它激起了一种杂多性(hctcrogeneity)、一种在种类和语域上的转变，或者完全不同的第三种事物、一种独异性(singularity)、一个容贯性平面(a plane of consistency)、一种不被包含在先前的级数中的剩余。正如我们看到的斯特恩的例子那样，只有当密切地涉及不可能性，只有当我们面向真正具有创造性的新增事物(additions)时，某个特定躯体中包含的无限的能力、“永恒的可能性”（Foucault\n\n8 微观政治\n\n157\n\n109","previous_page":156,"next_page":null}