{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","title":"德勒兹关键概念","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787568912952","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","id":"1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","uuid":"1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","title":"德勒兹关键概念","normalized_title":"德勒兹关键概念","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787568912952","isbns":["9787568912952","9781844652884"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":409,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%BE%B7%E5%8B%92%E5%85%B9%E5%85%B3%E9%94%AE%E6%A6%82%E5%BF%B5","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08/search"},"page":{"printed_page":"174 / 122","pdf_page":188,"physical_index":188,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"d0794394046b8ba04d4819708c47164244c7cd44ec0c34bf96dd044cddadb955"},"chapter":"德勒兹：关键概念 （原书第2版）","content":"女性主义学者早就警告过，通过把“生成女人”打造为生成中的一种具有特权的、未分化的状态，德勒兹和加塔利冒险弱化了女性主义的政治力量，也否定了生成一个女人的性别特殊性。在对生成-女人进行的第一次扩大化批判中，有一种是艾利斯·贾丁(Alice Jardine)的批判(1982,1984，1985)，其中，她控诉德勒兹和加塔利以(男性的)后结构主义方式盗用了女性，忽视了性别差异的特殊性，重新恢复了性别的陈规旧习，而这些最终与女性主义斗争及思想毫无关系。随后的对生成-女人的怀疑产生了一系列对德勒兹的生成-女人概念的关切。在这些关切中，都是指控生成-女人把性别差异、特殊性和自主性中立化了(Grosz1993：167);指控它对女人和女性主体阴茎崇拜般地进行盗用与盘剥(Grosz1993：177)，以便服务于“相对于异性的男性计划”(MacCorack2001);指控它通过越出主体性和同一性，磨灭了女性主义的政治力量，“最终导致了女人从历史情景中的消失，导致她们作为一种历史力量的隐退”(Braidotti1991：119)。提及这些关切似乎已经成为德勒兹式女性主义研究的必需了，同时也导致了杰里·弗利格（JerryFlieger)那带有偏向性的警告，“德勒兹的女性主义是一种逆喻(oxymoron)吗?\"(2000:39)。\n\n174\n\n德勒兹：关键概念(原书第2版)\n\n122","previous_page":187,"next_page":189}