{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","title":"德勒兹关键概念","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787568912952","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","id":"1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","uuid":"1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","title":"德勒兹关键概念","normalized_title":"德勒兹关键概念","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787568912952","isbns":["9787568912952","9781844652884"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":409,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%BE%B7%E5%8B%92%E5%85%B9%E5%85%B3%E9%94%AE%E6%A6%82%E5%BF%B5","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08/search"},"page":{"printed_page":"297 / 211","pdf_page":311,"physical_index":311,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"69871a3ba5fa91ebb4917d5be016a12c2ae7c765dea91ba0208dc8271bee78f6"},"chapter":"德勒兹：关键概念 （原书第2版）","content":"就此而言，人们可以把德勒兹与加塔利的第一次合作——《反俄狄浦斯：资本主义与精神分裂》(1972)—看作德勒兹“批评与临床”计划的一个新方向。这本书把严重的精神病现象作为其对象，而这种现象向临床治疗方法提出了大量问题：不仅存在着和精神分裂病原学的不一致，甚至其症状学都一直不确定。在对精神分裂的大多数精神病学解释中，治疗标准是以纯粹否定的(negative)方式而被给予的，也就是说，它和自我中形成的毁灭与紊乱有关：不爱交际，孤独症，脱离现实。精神分析师会坚持这种否定性观点，但在《反俄狄浦斯》中，德勒兹和加塔利尝试了一种相反的途径：“根据我们从与精神病学的联系中获得的提示，我们试图重新考察那些被用来描述神经症的概念”(DI：234)。他们试图追随卡尔·雅斯贝尔斯(Karl Jaspers)和 R.D.莱恩(R.D.Laing)，考察精神分裂的肯定性(positivity)，不再认为它在一种存在模式(自我)中被现实化，而是把它当成一个纯粹的过程(process)，也就是一种打断了个人或自我的、持续性的开放（opening）或破坏(breach)过程，它在一种充斥着“比现实更为”强烈、更为骇人之物的旅程中把自我夺走了(A：24)。因此他们在作为过程的精神分裂(“突破”)和作为临床实体的精神分裂(“断裂”)它是由这个过程的中断引起的—之间进行了严格区分。总之，德勒兹和加塔利试图倾听精神分裂的话语，并从中引出一幅关于心灵的“精神分裂式分析”的图景。结果就是他们的精神分裂式的“无器官身体”(schizophrenic Body without Organs) 这个概念，它有三个层面或组成部分：\n\n16 批评，临床\n\n297\n\n211","previous_page":310,"next_page":312}