{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","title":"德勒兹关键概念","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787568912952","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","id":"1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","uuid":"1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","title":"德勒兹关键概念","normalized_title":"德勒兹关键概念","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787568912952","isbns":["9787568912952","9781844652884"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":409,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%BE%B7%E5%8B%92%E5%85%B9%E5%85%B3%E9%94%AE%E6%A6%82%E5%BF%B5","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08/search"},"page":{"printed_page":46,"pdf_page":60,"physical_index":60,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"ac15d26d6ac924c36ee22a3a78fae4610e5ce809826ab0e9ff3b28fa1c9d1825"},"chapter":"德勒兹：关键概念 （原书第2版）","content":"34 平行论之谜\n\n表现一个观念意味着什么呢？在某种意义上，它只意味着对表现白身的理解能力。重点在于那种由理解行为表现出来的力，而非被表现出来的观念的特定属性；正如德勒兹强调的，“观念的材料在表象性内容(representative content)中是找不到的，而应在表现性内容(expressive content)中寻找……观念借此指向其他的观念或上帝的观念”(SPP：75)。这里所说的并非笛卡尔的那种情形，即某个观念的特性是“明白清晰的”，而是说或者恰当，或者不恰当地表现自身本质的那种理解能力。著名的主客二元论(subject-object dualism)在对这种理解行为的阐述中被削弱了，因为理解的观念，它的对象和行动力实际上是同一的。正如德勒兹所写的那样，“被表现的意义和被意指的对象(以及这个意义上对象的自我表现)之间的传统区分在斯宾诺莎主义中找到了直接的应用”(EPS：105)。因此，理解(understanding)理解(understands)它自身，而且，这表现了它的本质属性，斯宾诺莎把这叫作它的实体(substance)。理解(understanding)所理解(understands)的东西被定义为样式(modc)，它必然是无限的。德勒兹经常用“属性接着又表现在它们的样式中”(The attributes turm about in theri modes)’这句话来描述这个新的论断。“[理解的]属性被以某种可靠而确定的方式’表现出来，或者以有限的存在样式被表现出来，而属性中样式的表现形式却可以是无限的”(EPS：105)。\n\n46\n\n德勒兹：关键概念(原书第2版)","previous_page":null,"next_page":null}