{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","title":"德勒兹关键概念","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787568912952","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","id":"1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","uuid":"1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","title":"德勒兹关键概念","normalized_title":"德勒兹关键概念","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787568912952","isbns":["9787568912952","9781844652884"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":409,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%BE%B7%E5%8B%92%E5%85%B9%E5%85%B3%E9%94%AE%E6%A6%82%E5%BF%B5","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08/search"},"page":{"printed_page":50,"pdf_page":64,"physical_index":64,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"4a4bb3c64b1f26a257aafce13cb2e40329431ee18eb2e1f529c0d84f219f0aa3"},"chapter":"德勒兹：关键概念 （原书第2版）","content":"正是因为这个原因，间接话语，尤其是“自由的”间接话语才具有典型价值：这里没有清晰的明确的轮廓；占据首位的不是各种被个体化的陈述的介入，或不同的阐述主体的相互结合，而是一种集体性的装置，这种装置规定了相关的主体化过程，或者个体性的分配以及它们在话语中的动态分布。\n\n(ATP:80)\n\n德勒兹和加塔利竭尽全力地否认“个体阐释”（individualenunciation)的存在。他们写道：“不存在任何的个体阐释，甚至也不存在阐释的主体”(ATP：79)。因而，语言首先是社会性的且由陈述和口令(order-words)¹²组成。所以，言语行为重复着已经隐含在门令中的内容，但不是以被破译的符码或者被传递给一个被动主体的信息的那种方式在重复着。人们讲的话并不比人们重复的话多，这里，重点被放在了陈述的冗余(redundancy)以及和言语行为主体性相对应的相对的同一性(或稳定性)上；“陈述和[语言中的]行为之间的关系是内部的、内在的，但它并非一种同一性”\n\n50\n\n德勒兹：关键概念(原书第2版)","previous_page":49,"next_page":51}