{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","title":"德勒兹关键概念","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787568912952","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","id":"1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","uuid":"1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","title":"德勒兹关键概念","normalized_title":"德勒兹关键概念","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787568912952","isbns":["9787568912952","9781844652884"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":409,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%BE%B7%E5%8B%92%E5%85%B9%E5%85%B3%E9%94%AE%E6%A6%82%E5%BF%B5","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08/search"},"page":{"printed_page":56,"pdf_page":70,"physical_index":70,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"4cd7eea8c48b974cb26bf5ee1d6e5305d36b133ee744aaccd44b491861a3ee88"},"chapter":"德勒兹：关键概念 （原书第2版）","content":"德勒兹经常引用“明天将有一场海战”这句话来提出内部因素—正是这个因素使这句话表现了一个日期或一个口令的意义(ATP：86)—的问题。但德勒兹也注意到，口令之链和特定内容(或事件)的因果关联从未出现在我们面前，相反，我们似乎不断地从口令转向“事物的沉默的秩序”(Foucault，引自ATP：87)。因此，在《福柯》一书中，德勒兹表明，权力关系意味着在话语的陈述和非话语的可见性之间跨越而过的那个“别的东西”(that othcrthing)(FCLT：83)。换句话说，在今天，“权力”承担了那个超存在(extra-being)之名，这个超存在奔跃于两种不同的秩序之间但仍表现了它们之间的关系，或者说，使它们的关系作为一个知识问题而呈现出来。然而，如果说在更早的斯宾诺莎那里，权力是由一个表现它自身本质的观念统一起来的话，那么现在，权力就只能被规定为一个涵盖诸多力量的场域，或“以游牧方式被散布开来的差异因素”的多样性(Canning 2001：311-13)。在这里，问题又一次成为：这些因素如何联合起来产生彼此？这是一个涉及它们“实质”(virtuality)的问题，而且也是涉及权力关系之于言语方式—这些方式在任何特定时刻都表现了这些关系—的内在性的问题。正如德勒兹所写的：\n\n56\n\n德勒兹：关键概念(原书第2版)","previous_page":55,"next_page":57}