{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","title":"德勒兹关键概念","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787568912952","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","id":"1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","uuid":"1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","title":"德勒兹关键概念","normalized_title":"德勒兹关键概念","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787568912952","isbns":["9787568912952","9781844652884"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":409,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%BE%B7%E5%8B%92%E5%85%B9%E5%85%B3%E9%94%AE%E6%A6%82%E5%BF%B5","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08/search"},"page":{"printed_page":"69 / 49","pdf_page":83,"physical_index":83,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"3f21186ce4c931899efd154bffad03c3753a795524c3de217fe17a83d98b0ff5"},"chapter":"德勒兹：关键概念 （原书第2版）","content":"康德把理念描述为“不确定的”(problematic)(因为它是不可知的[unknowable]），德勒兹以此作为他的立论基础，以便把他关于理念的论点发展为“难题”(problem)本身(DR：168-70)。和某个“不确定的事物”(problermatic object)或事件(event)的相遇使我们意识到一个难题，它超越了我们的表象能力，也因为同样的原因激起了我们全部力量的运动，同时在感觉、记忆、想象和思想之间制造了一种接力。这个事物或“符号”，一方面充当了思想的虚拟视界的标志：“客观”（就其来白外部而言)但又不确定(intemminate)。另一方面，它呈现了一系列的独异性，这些独异性形成了实际解决办法的坐标和“有益的样板”。”德勒兹在这里所说的难题的“独异性”恰恰就是由“谁……?”、“如何……?”、“什么时候……？”和“在哪里……？”这些问题(questions)所暗示的那些同样的东西。然而，这些问题现在形成了难题的现实性条件，而不是一个概念的感觉得到的显现(sensiblemanifestation)。因而，德勒兹对黑格尔反对直觉性之“丰富”的论断做出了最终的回应，这个回应就是：独特事物—“这”、“这里”、“此刻”的意义只有在一个难题的背景下，只有在赋予它意义的思想的戏剧中才能被理解，没有这些的话，它实际上是贫乏的。\n\n3 差异，重复\n\n69\n\n49","previous_page":82,"next_page":84}