{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","title":"德勒兹关键概念","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787568912952","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","id":"1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","uuid":"1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","title":"德勒兹关键概念","normalized_title":"德勒兹关键概念","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787568912952","isbns":["9787568912952","9781844652884"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":409,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%BE%B7%E5%8B%92%E5%85%B9%E5%85%B3%E9%94%AE%E6%A6%82%E5%BF%B5","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/1cd40951-874b-4d06-9eea-f6afadf57c08/search"},"page":{"printed_page":92,"pdf_page":106,"physical_index":106,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"e8a5b054240e4e385a217d109883a927efedbc84a38ef7ea8fcabdc4c7efb099"},"chapter":"德勒兹：关键概念 （原书第2版）","content":"而所谓“欲望的转喻”或“欲望的衍称”则是说，欲望也像语言的接合一样，是一个不断延后的过程：“由于欲望永远是对别的东西有欲望’，欲望对象一旦落入掌握，便不再可欲，主体也会转移目标，将欲望投向其他对象。因此，拉康指出：欲望根本就是一种衍称。”以上解释引用自狄伦·伊凡斯(DylanEvans)编辑的《拉冈精神分析词汇》，刘纪蕙、廖朝阳等译，台湾巨流图书股份有限公司2009年版，第191-192页。—译者注“无限衍义”(infinite scmiosis)是符号表意的基本方式，艾柯称之为unlimited semiosis。皮尔斯认为：在符号接收者心里，每个符号都可以获得一个新的意义，变成一个新的符号，从而构成无尽头的一系列相继的解释项并呈链条状分布。由此，他给符号一个悖论式定义：“解释项变成一个新的符号，以至无穷，符号就是我们为了了解别的东西才了解的东西。”这样一来，符号过程在理论上就是不可能终结的，因为解释符号的符号依然需要另一个符号来解释。符号的意义本身就是无限衍义的过程，没有衍义就无法讨论意义，解释意义本身就是衍义。因此，从本质上来说，符号学是流动的，是衍生的，永远没有尽头。\n\n查尔斯·桑德斯·皮尔斯(Charles Sanders Santiago Peirce， 1839—\n\n92\n\n德勒兹：关键概念(原书第2版)","previous_page":91,"next_page":93}