{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"1d3bd28e-c1ba-4af2-8580-60b32ef26053","title":"If...Then Algorithmic Power and Politics","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"2017054909","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"1d3bd28e-c1ba-4af2-8580-60b32ef26053","id":"1d3bd28e-c1ba-4af2-8580-60b32ef26053","uuid":"1d3bd28e-c1ba-4af2-8580-60b32ef26053","title":"If...Then Algorithmic Power and Politics","normalized_title":"ifthenalgorithmicpowerandpolitics","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"2017054909","isbns":["2017054909","9780190493042","9780190493059"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":211,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/1d3bd28e-c1ba-4af2-8580-60b32ef26053","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/If...Then%20Algorithmic%20Power%20and%20Politics","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/1d3bd28e-c1ba-4af2-8580-60b32ef26053/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/1d3bd28e-c1ba-4af2-8580-60b32ef26053/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/1d3bd28e-c1ba-4af2-8580-60b32ef26053","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/1d3bd28e-c1ba-4af2-8580-60b32ef26053/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/1d3bd28e-c1ba-4af2-8580-60b32ef26053/search"},"page":{"printed_page":142,"pdf_page":152,"physical_index":152,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"39ff842ed747490282d2c94abcf382926b9e81c1ae50b05420fdeac3d3ba5971"},"chapter":"IF...THEN","content":"Algorithms as Problematization\n\nAlgorithms do not merely solve or create new problems, as the interviews make perfectly clear. They also need to be understood as “problematization” devices that work to question the accepted boundaries and definitions of journalism itself. It is here that we see most clearly the eventfulness of algorithms at play. As I argued in chapter 3, the notion of event allows for an analytical position that is not so much interested in establishing the “empirical accuracy” (Michael, 2004) of what the algorithm is or what it means, but which instead looks at how algorithms have the capacity to produce new orderings or disorderings.14 As Mackenzie points out, “event thinking” has helped scholars “think about the contingency of new formations or assemblages without ‘front-loading’ a particular ontological commitment” (2005: 388). In talking to news media professionals and observing the ways in which algorithms have emerged as an object of concern within journalism, it seems to me that the power and politics of algorithms are manifested in the way they problematize accepted boundaries. Paul Rabinow says of an event that it makes “things work in a diferent manner and produces and instantiates new capacities. A form/ event makes many other things more or less suddenly conceivable” (1999: 180). Just as “events problematize classifications, practices, things” (Rabinow, 2009: 67), an algorithm, I suggest, “puts into question or problematises an existing set of boundaries or limits within” journalism (Mackenzie, 2005: 388). In going forward, the question is not just what happens to particular domains when they introduce an algorithm, but how algorithms as events make it “possible to feel, perceive, act or know diferently” (2005: 388).\n\n142\n\nI F . . . T H E N","previous_page":141,"next_page":143}