{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"1d910fbb-daa5-464d-8ee8-feab02de0c8c","title":"马克思价值理论研究","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"1d910fbb-daa5-464d-8ee8-feab02de0c8c","id":"1d910fbb-daa5-464d-8ee8-feab02de0c8c","uuid":"1d910fbb-daa5-464d-8ee8-feab02de0c8c","title":"马克思价值理论研究","normalized_title":"马克思价值理论研究","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":401,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/1d910fbb-daa5-464d-8ee8-feab02de0c8c","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E9%A9%AC%E5%85%8B%E6%80%9D%E4%BB%B7%E5%80%BC%E7%90%86%E8%AE%BA%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/1d910fbb-daa5-464d-8ee8-feab02de0c8c/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/1d910fbb-daa5-464d-8ee8-feab02de0c8c/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/1d910fbb-daa5-464d-8ee8-feab02de0c8c","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/1d910fbb-daa5-464d-8ee8-feab02de0c8c/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/1d910fbb-daa5-464d-8ee8-feab02de0c8c/search"},"page":{"printed_page":66,"pdf_page":112,"physical_index":112,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"5f3287d236cd2245bea2148ec065bf454fe6d4bd5ed2da2865ce58f8ca13ffd7"},"chapter":"第六章司徒卢威的商品拜物教理论","content":"我们注意到，司徒卢威并没有把社会生产关系明确分为两种类型：相互的经济关系和社会关系。他错误地认为马克思做出了一个“科学上不一致的解释”，即“社会范畴，作为社会‘关系’的资本源自经济范畴——价值”②。首先必须指出，在《经济与价格》第30页，司徒卢威自相矛盾地认为“价值”是一个“相互的经济”范畴，而非“经济的”范畴。显然，司徒卢威把主观的价值和“经济”范畴关联了起来，把客观的交换价值和“相互的经济”范畴关联了起来（把这里的表述和他在《经济与价格》第25页的推理比较一下就可看出来)。但是司徒卢威明白这个事实，即马克思是从客观的而非主观的价值得出资本（概念）\n\n马克思价值理论研究\n\n① 司徒卢威．经济与价格：第一卷 [M]， 31-32.\n\n②同上，第29页。\n\n66","previous_page":65,"next_page":67}