{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"1dc0854c-957b-4fb1-af9a-bb4fdb76b77e","title":"Time, Consumption and Everyday Life Practice, Materiality and Culture","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"1dc0854c-957b-4fb1-af9a-bb4fdb76b77e","id":"1dc0854c-957b-4fb1-af9a-bb4fdb76b77e","uuid":"1dc0854c-957b-4fb1-af9a-bb4fdb76b77e","title":"Time, Consumption and Everyday Life Practice, Materiality and Culture","normalized_title":"timeconsumptionandeverydaylifepracticematerialityandculture","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":236,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/1dc0854c-957b-4fb1-af9a-bb4fdb76b77e","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/Time%2C%20Consumption%20and%20Everyday%20Life%20Practice%2C%20Materiality%20and%20Culture","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/1dc0854c-957b-4fb1-af9a-bb4fdb76b77e/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/1dc0854c-957b-4fb1-af9a-bb4fdb76b77e/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/1dc0854c-957b-4fb1-af9a-bb4fdb76b77e","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/1dc0854c-957b-4fb1-af9a-bb4fdb76b77e/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/1dc0854c-957b-4fb1-af9a-bb4fdb76b77e/search"},"page":{"printed_page":42,"pdf_page":47,"physical_index":47,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"4aa37569a9bb7162c17def17f84776ee6fee2274f274994c66bbcadf36558e47"},"chapter":"List of Tables and Figures","content":"Action Coordination\n\nAlthough there is more to social life than coordinated actions, coordination is obviously central. Examples of coordination include the following:\n\n1. After the fourth race meeting someone at the top of the stairs that descend to the interior paddock.\n\n2. A couple taking turns betting on races while the other person talks with friends in their box.\n\n3. The jockeys lined up on their horses in the starting gate.\n\n4. Employees changing behaviour in response to a management decision to provide better customer service communicated to them by letter.\n\n5. The actions of grooms, auctioneers, bidders, ushers and announcers at a horse sale.\n\nThe coordination of actions is explained by the interwoven timespaces of the actions involved. For instance, the meeting at the head of the stairs rests on a common past (the completion of the fourth race) and a shared spatiality (the stairs as a place to meet); the behaviour of the convivial betting couple arises from a shared future (acting for the sake of combining betting and being social), common and shared pasts (e.g. that the race is finished, that you bet last time) and a common or shared spatiality that encompasses boxes, aisles, betting windows, and so on; and the fact that the jockeys sit in a line on their mounts reflects common futures and spatialities.\n\nI have been treating the interwovenness of timespaces as a matter of commonality and sharing. In the above employee–management example, track employees and managers partly proceed through common or shared place-path arrays. It is not obvious, however, how common or shared their futures and pasts are. Regardless of how divergent their futures and pasts might be, however, these futures and pasts will often not be independent of one another. The fact, for example, that management acts for the sake of improving visitors’ experiences is connected to the fact that employees have been acting out of indifference or disdain, or for the sake of heading home as quickly as possible. When people pursue ends and projects that differ from, but are not independent of, those that others pursue, I will say that their futures are ‘orchestrated’. The futures of the activities of the grooms, auctioneers, bidders and announcers at the horse sale are orchestrated. The meeting at the stairs might also be orchestrated since the people meeting might do so for different, but interdependent, ends. Pasts, too, can be orchestrated. The fact, for example, that at the horse sale grooms lead their charges into the show ring at a signal from an usher is not independent of bidders turning towards the ring as the auctioneer begins to describe the next horse for sale. In short, timespaces are interwoven, not just through commonality and sharing, but also through orchestration. Notice, incidentally, that the coordination of action via interwoven timespaces can extend across practices; in the case of the horse sale, for example, across the practices of grooming, auctioning, bidding and announcing. I return to this phenomenon in the following section.\n\n42\n\nTed Schatzki","previous_page":41,"next_page":43}