{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"228f0c0d-2779-4136-9d68-0e7616b3a34f","title":"资本的限度","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787508673165","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"228f0c0d-2779-4136-9d68-0e7616b3a34f","id":"228f0c0d-2779-4136-9d68-0e7616b3a34f","uuid":"228f0c0d-2779-4136-9d68-0e7616b3a34f","title":"资本的限度","normalized_title":"资本的限度","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787508673165","isbns":["9787508673165"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":735,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/228f0c0d-2779-4136-9d68-0e7616b3a34f","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E7%9A%84%E9%99%90%E5%BA%A6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/228f0c0d-2779-4136-9d68-0e7616b3a34f/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/228f0c0d-2779-4136-9d68-0e7616b3a34f/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/228f0c0d-2779-4136-9d68-0e7616b3a34f","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/228f0c0d-2779-4136-9d68-0e7616b3a34f/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/228f0c0d-2779-4136-9d68-0e7616b3a34f/search"},"page":{"printed_page":"106 / 193","pdf_page":201,"physical_index":201,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"356dff61dde3b84ab3fb5402bee03ab5921ac21a245b454f9766df67053594ea"},"chapter":"第4章 技术变革、劳动过程和资本的价值构成","content":"重要的是劳动者的集体生产率，而不是个人生产率—这个观点会影响我们对生产力的看法。劳动者在执行各种不同的任务时相互关联、彼此支援，这些做法显然会对他们的集体生产率产生作用。效率不是一个纯粹的技术问题；它至少在一定程度上是一个社会问题，这是所有劳资关系专家都知道的。资本家的两难在于他要把协作的积极力量作为资本的生产力发动起来，但是归根到底，这种发动所凭借的机制必定会被评判为强制性的机制。职务充实（job enrichment）、合作8、工人管理整合等策略似乎是专门为了掩盖支配与服从的基本关系而设计的，这种关系在劳动过程中必然具有主导地位。然而，这要求我们考察阶级斗争在劳动过程本身当中的决定性作用。\n\n106\n\n第4章技术变革劳动过程和资本的价值构成\n\n① 倘若有兴趣追随这场辩论，就应该参考法恩与哈里斯（1979，第3章）、高夫(Gough)(1972)、亨特(Hunt)(1979)、奥康纳(O'Connor)(1975)和多期《社会主义经济学家大会公报》(Bulletin of the Conference of Socialist Economists)(1973—1975)。关于这个问题还有大量法语文献：见贝尔图（Berthoud)(1974)、弗雷斯内(Freyssenet)(1971；1977)和纳赫斯(Nagels)(1974)。一些作者—比如普兰查斯（Poulantzas)(1975）——还认为，工人阶级的某些派系在主观意识状况方面的差异源自生产性的工人与非生产性的工人的不同地位，因而使这场辩论获得了额外的意义。\n\n193","previous_page":200,"next_page":202}