{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"228f0c0d-2779-4136-9d68-0e7616b3a34f","title":"资本的限度","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787508673165","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"228f0c0d-2779-4136-9d68-0e7616b3a34f","id":"228f0c0d-2779-4136-9d68-0e7616b3a34f","uuid":"228f0c0d-2779-4136-9d68-0e7616b3a34f","title":"资本的限度","normalized_title":"资本的限度","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787508673165","isbns":["9787508673165"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":735,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/228f0c0d-2779-4136-9d68-0e7616b3a34f","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E7%9A%84%E9%99%90%E5%BA%A6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/228f0c0d-2779-4136-9d68-0e7616b3a34f/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/228f0c0d-2779-4136-9d68-0e7616b3a34f/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/228f0c0d-2779-4136-9d68-0e7616b3a34f","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/228f0c0d-2779-4136-9d68-0e7616b3a34f/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/228f0c0d-2779-4136-9d68-0e7616b3a34f/search"},"page":{"printed_page":"162 / 271","pdf_page":279,"physical_index":279,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"fb6c509e806098d510df0ced2bb2696a17732157378ff75485426c39cd6f68b3"},"chapter":"第6章 积累的动态","content":"马克思还假定，工人的家庭没有能力为自己生产任何东西，因而劳动力的价值完全是通过市场中的商品交换来界定的；这个假定也制造了一些在理论中和历史中都十分有趣的问题。倘若工人可以供养自己，劳动力的价值就会降低，资本积累的速度也就会提高。从这个立场来看，尽量迫使劳动力再生产的成本回到家庭生活的框架中（因而一般会落到女性的肩膀上）是对资本家自己有利的。①于是，这意味着工人必须有机会至少获得有限的、属于自己的生产资料。但是工人倘若可以在一定程度上处理好与自己的再生产相关的需要，就不太需要参加雇佣劳动了，而且在遇到罢工和其他形式的劳工斗争时肯定会更加坚韧。从这个立场来看，提高工人对商品交换的依赖才是对资本家阶级有利的。但这意味着要让劳工的生活水平得以上升、让劳动力的价值得以提高。\n\n第6章积累的动态\n\n162\n\n① 我们必须在这个语境下考察家庭在确定劳动力的价值时所起的作用这个大问题。参见《新左派评论》(New Left Review)中的辩论这是由塞科姆（Seccombe)(1974）所发表的文章引起的；亦见社会主义经济学家大会(Conference of Socialist Economists)(1976)；希默尔魏特(Himmelweit)与莫恩(Mohun)(1977）和马洛斯（Malos)(1980)。\n\n271","previous_page":278,"next_page":280}