{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"228f0c0d-2779-4136-9d68-0e7616b3a34f","title":"资本的限度","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787508673165","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"228f0c0d-2779-4136-9d68-0e7616b3a34f","id":"228f0c0d-2779-4136-9d68-0e7616b3a34f","uuid":"228f0c0d-2779-4136-9d68-0e7616b3a34f","title":"资本的限度","normalized_title":"资本的限度","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787508673165","isbns":["9787508673165"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":735,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/228f0c0d-2779-4136-9d68-0e7616b3a34f","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E7%9A%84%E9%99%90%E5%BA%A6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/228f0c0d-2779-4136-9d68-0e7616b3a34f/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/228f0c0d-2779-4136-9d68-0e7616b3a34f/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/228f0c0d-2779-4136-9d68-0e7616b3a34f","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/228f0c0d-2779-4136-9d68-0e7616b3a34f/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/228f0c0d-2779-4136-9d68-0e7616b3a34f/search"},"page":{"printed_page":"292 / 457","pdf_page":465,"physical_index":465,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"0683e2fdfb6ca4c9e12297ac3e07ba7bb48237cdd81714d7ea82484771e03cd0"},"chapter":"第10章 金融资本及其矛盾","content":"列宁在两个方面有别于希法亭。第一，就主要的帝国主义权力而言，他似乎接受了金融资本与一国的资本之间的同一性；到了分析世界资本主义的总体状况时，他往往就会切换到一种超国家的金融资本概念—这个立场与霍布森相似。就此而言，列宁的表述比希法亭更加模棱两可。第二，他提到了希法亭在货币理论中的错误。至于这个错误的本质或后果，列宁并没有为我们带来启发。德布伦霍夫最近直接面对了这个错误。这是非常重要的，值得加以讨论。\n\n德布伦霍夫认为（1971，第81—93页)，希法亭只是在模式上追随了马克思。他把金融资本看作银行资本与产业资本的统一体，这使得他构造了一种“关于货币现象的金融理论”，而马克思建立的是“关于金融的货币理论”。这个差别十分重要。马克思在分析商品的生产和交换时并没有涉及资本流通，而他的货币理论就是从这番分析中建立的。在这样做的时候，他首先识别出了作为价值尺度的货币与作为流通手段的货币之间的矛盾，并在由此打下的基础上研究了这个矛盾在货币作为资本来流通时会如何加剧。这个矛盾在希法亭的著作中几乎\n\n292\n\n第10章金融资本及其矛盾\n\n① 丘奇沃德（Churchward)(1959，第78页）指出，列宁甚至质疑了希法亭关于金融资本的基本概念，并在笔记中写道：“说金融资本=银行资本’，还不够吗？”18阿里吉（Arrighi)(1978)强调了霍布森与希法亭的差别。\n\n457","previous_page":464,"next_page":466}