{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"228f0c0d-2779-4136-9d68-0e7616b3a34f","title":"资本的限度","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787508673165","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"228f0c0d-2779-4136-9d68-0e7616b3a34f","id":"228f0c0d-2779-4136-9d68-0e7616b3a34f","uuid":"228f0c0d-2779-4136-9d68-0e7616b3a34f","title":"资本的限度","normalized_title":"资本的限度","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787508673165","isbns":["9787508673165"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":735,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/228f0c0d-2779-4136-9d68-0e7616b3a34f","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E7%9A%84%E9%99%90%E5%BA%A6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/228f0c0d-2779-4136-9d68-0e7616b3a34f/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/228f0c0d-2779-4136-9d68-0e7616b3a34f/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/228f0c0d-2779-4136-9d68-0e7616b3a34f","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/228f0c0d-2779-4136-9d68-0e7616b3a34f/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/228f0c0d-2779-4136-9d68-0e7616b3a34f/search"},"page":{"printed_page":"333 / 515","pdf_page":523,"physical_index":523,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"c14344dd1e0fbb442f18382669140c36be94b4e9e9ba3fd1f27e4f44f4e0bb0e"},"chapter":"第11章 租金理论","content":"那么，既然土地本身按其定义就不是价值的来源，土地所有权又可以在什么意义上“增殖价值”？在剥掉了所有“受到歪曲和模糊不清的附加物”之后，土地所有者在资本主义生产方式当中到底有何种阶级地位？租金使土地所有权站在了谁的对立面，资本家、劳动者还是这两者？简言之，对租金的占有导致了谁对谁的剥削？①\n\n由于在现象世界中，生产的各个要素土地、劳动和资本—看起来仿佛被赋予了魔术般的力量，仿佛由此成了价值的来源，所以上述问题的答案就变得愈发难以寻找了。我们也许可以预料到，马克思在讨论这些拜物教的观念时把他的尖锐发挥到了极致（《剩余价值理论》第3册，第453—540页；《资本论》第3卷，第48章)。可是他也承认，倘若生产者“对资本—利息，土地一地租，劳动一工资这些异化的不合理的形式，感到很自在”，那是很“自然的”，“因为他们就是在这些假象的形态中活动的，他们每天都要和这些形态打交道”7。个别生产者除了关心自己为工资、利息、租金和不变资本所进行的支付之外，就只能把心思用在自己赚取的利润上面了（《资本论》第3卷，第830—835页）。他们所支付的租金是非常现实的，他们对一个也许的确是拜物教的范畴所做的回应也具有非常现实的后果，必须予以考虑。有了价值理论，我们就很容易剥掉必然存在的拜物教—它们笼罩了日常经验但是问题并没有到此为止。在价值理论本身的框架中界定一种连贯的地租理论成了一项理论性的挑战。这是我们手上的当务之急。\n\n333\n\n第11章－租金理论\n\n① 雷伊（1973，第24页）以这种方式提出了这个问题。\n\n515","previous_page":522,"next_page":524}