{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"228f0c0d-2779-4136-9d68-0e7616b3a34f","title":"资本的限度","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787508673165","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"228f0c0d-2779-4136-9d68-0e7616b3a34f","id":"228f0c0d-2779-4136-9d68-0e7616b3a34f","uuid":"228f0c0d-2779-4136-9d68-0e7616b3a34f","title":"资本的限度","normalized_title":"资本的限度","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787508673165","isbns":["9787508673165"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":735,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/228f0c0d-2779-4136-9d68-0e7616b3a34f","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E7%9A%84%E9%99%90%E5%BA%A6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/228f0c0d-2779-4136-9d68-0e7616b3a34f/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/228f0c0d-2779-4136-9d68-0e7616b3a34f/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/228f0c0d-2779-4136-9d68-0e7616b3a34f","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/228f0c0d-2779-4136-9d68-0e7616b3a34f/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/228f0c0d-2779-4136-9d68-0e7616b3a34f/search"},"page":{"printed_page":454,"pdf_page":462,"physical_index":462,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"e9d7fe48005ab719f67640a8a9d962a4f3b985b1737a884ee5091669138830f6"},"chapter":"第10章 金融资本及其矛盾","content":"可是，列宁的论述所包含的理论内容决不能说是清晰的。他并没有在任何地方阐发金融资本的概念；至于它究竟以什么方式把资本主义的内在矛盾转化成了帝国主义之间的争斗，也仍然很难看清。他的许多观点是从霍布森、布哈林和希法亭所提出的截然不同的思想框架中得来的，这多少有些兼收并蓄。①只有希法亭在马克思主义的框架中为金融资本的概念给出了一个非常坚固的理论根基。列宁虽然强烈批判了希法亭的政治路线，却似乎接受了希法亭所提出的金融资本的基本概念，只有一点保留意见。这唯一的保留意见关系到希法亭关于货币的“错误”看法。①至于这个错误的本质，列宁为我们留下的却是一片黑暗。我们很快就会看到这个错误是多么关键。但我们首先必须考察希法亭的贡献。\n\n资本的限度\n\n454\n\n①霍布森(1965版)、希法亭(1970版）和布哈林（1972a)。布哈林的著作是在列宁的著作之后出版的，但是多半对列宁有影响，因为列宁至少在出版他关于这个主题的著作之前一年就为布哈林的著作写了序言。丘奇沃德（Churchward)(1959)记述了由列宁的笔记所显示出的广泛阅读背景，而阿里吉（Arrighi)(1978)批判性地考察了霍布森的贡献。","previous_page":null,"next_page":455}