{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","uuid":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","normalized_title":"技术体系理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","isbns":["9787552024104"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":328,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E4%BD%93%E7%B3%BB%EF%BC%9A%E7%90%86%E6%80%A7%E7%9A%84%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E7%94%9F%E6%B4%BB","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/search"},"page":{"printed_page":"107 / 72","pdf_page":123,"physical_index":123,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"bf31ab0479f0d11091d8774f76bfa3de26902205e37d007d50c85993d60b8153"},"chapter":"第三章具体化西蒙栋和建构主义","content":"但是，社会技术合理性的作用在这些理论中也被淡化了。如果不解释它们遭遇的理性形式，就无法充分理解外行和专家行动者之间的斗争。在接下来的章节中，我将解释在以前的技术批判传统和对技术设计的社会影响的建构主义理解之间，西蒙栋的理论如何架起了一座桥梁。\n\n关于具体化的理论\n\n西蒙栋把技术性(technicity)—也就是使技术成为技术的(makes technology technical)东西—与效用，即它与人类需求的关系，区分开来。技术性是指技术的本质属性，它对应着一种与技术内在逻辑相联系的“技术的思维方式(technical mentality)”。技术性体现于每一种技术设备和体系中，并塑造了现代文化。西蒙栋相信，技术性的全面发展将协调人和机器。\n\n虽然我们通常认为技术是有用的，但西蒙栋要求我称之为“悬置”的东西，即悬置对有用性的判断。①对技术的解释绝不能与人类的目的相混淆，而必须以其独立的“存在方式”的规律为基础。这些规律主宰了一种渐进的发展，最终形成了“技术性个体”，即工业时代的机器。\n\n第三章 具体化西蒙栋和建构主义\n\n107\n\n72\n\n① JasonChilvers and Matthew Kearnes, eds.,Remaking Participation:Science, Environment and Emergent Publics (London: Routledge, 2015); Callon, Lascoumes, and Barthe, Acting inan Uncertain World; Jasanoff, \"The Idiom of Co-Production\", 1-12.","previous_page":122,"next_page":124}