{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","uuid":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","normalized_title":"技术体系理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","isbns":["9787552024104"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":328,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E4%BD%93%E7%B3%BB%EF%BC%9A%E7%90%86%E6%80%A7%E7%9A%84%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E7%94%9F%E6%B4%BB","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/search"},"page":{"printed_page":"123 / 82","pdf_page":139,"physical_index":139,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"01baa94f68094c88eaac6f894f8cf135bc7ad77c182f9be31eb85ea8e8d7e7e4"},"chapter":"第三章具体化西蒙栋和建构主义","content":"使用上的二律背反。\n\n具体化的政治\n\n在结论部分中，我将勾勒出这种试图在西蒙栋、马尔库塞和建构主义中寻找技术政治资源的一些含义。①当代技术斗争具有深刻的政治性。这是由新的行动者介入设计过程所引起的，即那些被排除在原先的影响力网络之外的行动者。在规范整个技术领域的规则受到成功挑战的情况下，这些介入重新界定了进步的意义。正如西蒙栋所言，技术变革的内在动力在这一过程中发挥了作用。正当这些介入实现了技术一致性的时候，它们的结果反映并实现了一个社会世界。②现在让我更详细地解释这几点。\n\n建构主义是通过技术的社会关联和参与的透镜来看待技术的。无论是作为技术的内在逻辑，还是作为一种文化现象，西蒙栋的技术性概念都不起任何作用。因此，建构主义依赖于与西蒙栋互补的一种悬置，即在这种情况下，悬置对技术性而不是对技术的功利方面的判断。这并不意味着建构主义者忽视技术。相反，他们对一些理论表示怀疑，比如西蒙栋所假定的一种特定的技术合理性形式，或者相关的理论，如马尔库塞强烈反对将这种合理性强加于现代生活的各个方面。\n\n第三章 具体化西蒙栋和建构主义\n\n123\n\n82\n\n①对于更早期的理论解释，参见：Feenberg，Transforming Technology，chap. 7; Feenberg, Between Reason and Experience, chap. 1 and 4.\n\n② Feenberg, Transforming Technology, 77- 78.","previous_page":138,"next_page":140}