{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","uuid":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","normalized_title":"技术体系理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","isbns":["9787552024104"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":328,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E4%BD%93%E7%B3%BB%EF%BC%9A%E7%90%86%E6%80%A7%E7%9A%84%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E7%94%9F%E6%B4%BB","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/search"},"page":{"printed_page":143,"pdf_page":159,"physical_index":159,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"fb3cad5545624113a57220e8aef8b0cbda7bb109a4374e212cca4bd216cf17fa"},"chapter":"第四章讨论中的互联网","content":"Zizek)的拉康精神分析的范畴。这种解释取决于在对人所缺乏的东西的欲望和对缺乏自身的欲望之间的差别(thedifferencebetween desiring what one lacks and desiring the lack itself)。后种欲望的形式涉及在追求一些难以捉摸的东西时的强迫性的重复，这种东西是在追求它的过程中尽可能获得的。追求本身成为自己的客体，并产生一种不断吸引主体的愉快。任何玩过电子游戏的人都会认识到这种综合征。总之，迪恩用强迫性神经症模型描述了互联网上的通信。\n\n但其影响并不仅仅是个人的。网络中的参与形成了一种无法与资本主义社会的政治现实相抗衡的主体类型。陷入一个没有内容的通信网络，主体以争论代替行动并且错将参与当作权力。每当他们发表意见或签署网上请愿书时，他们都有关于政治效力的错觉，但实际上，他们是技术拜物教的受害者。互联网不会自动放大观点的重要性，而只是将它们登记为现实政治行动的空白占位符。迪恩写道：“我们的参与不会破坏交往资本主义。是驱动了它。”①因此互联网上的信息传播使人们非政治化，并将其与通信资本主义相结合。迪恩承认，互联网可能存在有效的政治用途，但她认为与其整体的非政治化效应相比，这些用途相对微不足道。\n\n我发现迪恩对互联网上的通信失败的大部分分析是有说服力的，以至于她得出了这些政治结论。基于什么原因，她认为她关注的活动是互联网最重要的影响，能够真正重塑用户的主体性呢？\n\n第四章 讨论中的互联网\n\n143\n\n96\n\n① Ibid. , 114.","previous_page":142,"next_page":144}