{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","uuid":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","normalized_title":"技术体系理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","isbns":["9787552024104"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":328,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E4%BD%93%E7%B3%BB%EF%BC%9A%E7%90%86%E6%80%A7%E7%9A%84%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E7%94%9F%E6%B4%BB","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/search"},"page":{"printed_page":146,"pdf_page":162,"physical_index":162,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"8af862df84931b9ca7ed53eb42dca5fdec96281ba7989eb5454d74465898e157"},"chapter":"第四章讨论中的互联网","content":"大量的通信可以被吸收到消费社会的仪式中，这一发现是重要的洞察力，但事实仍然是，真正自由的、互惠的、自下而上的通信具有解放的潜力，并且这种通信确实发生在互联网上。事实上，今天的每一个激进运动都建立在它的基础上。政治上意义重大的通信可能不像迪恩批评的那样普遍，但它仍然扮演着重要的角色。严肃的讨论和辩论并没有从互联网上消失。①\n\n迪恩的批评依赖于互联网技术特有的一种幻觉它能够记录屏幕上发生的一切。再一次，我可以通过人行道的比喻来最好地解释为什么这很重要。由于我们没有人行道上的谈话记录就像我们在互联网上做的那样，我们无法根据其激进的政治或综合效应将各种对话进行比较。每件事都是在人行道上讨论的，但毫无疑问，正如喋喋不休的迪恩所分析那样，其中的大部分都是无聊和毫无意义的。因为它是短暂的，没有人批评人行道是一种媒介。在那里言论自由的民主意义不能简化为一个比例的问题(a question of proportions)。\n\n98\n\n146\n\n技术体系：理性的社会生活\n\n①为了详细分析在几个网站上的辩论，参见：G. Glass，“CommentSpace” (unpublished doctoral dissertation, Simon Fraser University, 2015), http://summit. sfu. ca/item/16120.","previous_page":145,"next_page":null}