{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","uuid":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","normalized_title":"技术体系理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","isbns":["9787552024104"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":328,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E4%BD%93%E7%B3%BB%EF%BC%9A%E7%90%86%E6%80%A7%E7%9A%84%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E7%94%9F%E6%B4%BB","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/search"},"page":{"printed_page":172,"pdf_page":188,"physical_index":188,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"5d2904dac517af2dcee68de992a1b8ce62f251d9f1feeca0c4479404c71e76f9"},"chapter":"第五章技术体系时代的理性和经验","content":"版本。\n\n为了反对这种唯灵论的结果，唐·伊德(DonIhde)坚持只有通过“发生在技术文化中的感受性的格式塔转换”才能克服现代性的危机。①这种转换之所以可能是因为技术是“多重稳定的”(multistable)。技术的多重稳定性，即伊德版本的非充分决定性，导致了内部变化的可能性。格式塔转换因内源于技术体系的原则而发生，无须从政治、哲学、宗教或其他外部资源中导入标准。我在这里也采用这种策略。\n\n格式塔转换让人想起黑格尔-马克思主义者对那些徘徊于感觉与幻想之间、与现实建制绝缘的价值的拒斥。黑格尔对他所认为的个人对现状的不满，持批判态度。更为根本性的问题是“现实化”(actualization)，即通过建制化而得以实现的价值。在黑格尔看来，家庭、经济和国家显露了道德秩序。他试图展示个人在生活中所遵循的理性符合这些建制的要求。个人与社会，自由与法律，是相互妥协的。②\n\n批判理论也坚持价值在技术体系中得以实现，却并不遵循黑格尔的理论。与现实之间的黑格尔式妥协只要在拥有建制化逻辑与人们的需求相冲突的经验时就会产生。这种冲突总是呼唤着建制想要压制的某种变化，而建制的压制并非出于黑格尔所说的与规范的肯定性关系，而是出于维护工具理性的垄断性要求。\n\n172\n\n技术体系：理性的社会生活\n\n116\n\n① Don Ihde, Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1990) , 200.\n\n② Robert B. Pippin, Hegel's Practical Philosophy: Rational Agency as Ethical Life (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).","previous_page":null,"next_page":173}