{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","uuid":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","normalized_title":"技术体系理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","isbns":["9787552024104"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":328,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E4%BD%93%E7%B3%BB%EF%BC%9A%E7%90%86%E6%80%A7%E7%9A%84%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E7%94%9F%E6%B4%BB","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/search"},"page":{"printed_page":"183 / 124","pdf_page":199,"physical_index":199,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"11466a5f7b0cef95cab079a71477d07b8154f82bec396618e7f4b737ca4dbbb4"},"chapter":"第五章技术体系时代的理性和经验","content":"这段文字解释并改造了海德格尔对世界性的超越分析。海德格尔论证我们周围的世界由一个工具系统构成，而这些工具响应着我们对自身未来身份的关注。这个工具系统由把人造物连接在一起的指称构成，连接人造物这一工作的最终目的是为了丰富此在(Dasein)的自我创造。海德格尔所“关注”的就是这一原创性动机，即人对身份认同的追求。\n\n在马尔库塞看来，这个工具系统成为了“技术性”，即根植于人类需求中的、以历史方式确立的技术系统。②海德格尔的工具行为的本体论以理论化的方式连接了人与世界，而不涉及特定目的。在西蒙栋的影响下，马尔库塞的技术性概念意味着一种发展动力观，得以在未来调停人与技术。他把海德格尔的本体论说明转变为对技术未能成功地达成其目标(即满足需求)的规范性说明。马尔库塞对比了两种对技术的先验理解，一种是不成功的、以支配为目标的理解，另一种是通过实现人与物的内在潜能而达成技术目的的理解。\n\n第五章 技术体系时代的理性和经验\n\n183\n\n124\n\n① Herbert Marcuse, “From Ontologyto Technology,\" in Philosophy, Psychoanalysis and Emancipation, 136-137.\n\n② Simondon, Du Mode d'Existence des Objets Techniques, 239.","previous_page":198,"next_page":200}