{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","uuid":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","normalized_title":"技术体系理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","isbns":["9787552024104"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":328,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E4%BD%93%E7%B3%BB%EF%BC%9A%E7%90%86%E6%80%A7%E7%9A%84%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E7%94%9F%E6%B4%BB","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/search"},"page":{"printed_page":188,"pdf_page":204,"physical_index":204,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"bf337151c132c3553a1bd73550e38d4e36ad3c5f571e710f9064074d3cc967eb"},"chapter":"第五章技术体系时代的理性和经验","content":"批判理论面对着格式塔转换的阻碍时，提出了实现转换的不同方式。然而，无论是霍克海默还是海德格尔，即便他们最好的努力也难以避免价值与事实的二元对立。从废除现代性的权威观点出发，这种“理性的新观念”持有一个它无法兑现的承诺。它是一个和谐的理想化状态，而非一个具体的替代品。霍克海默认为它是个还未满足也无法满足的急切需求，马尔库塞将之描述为一种假设的革命可能性。在这两种形态中，价值都处于矛盾的位置上。我提出了一种不同的进路，我要论证的是，合理性具有两种特性，穿越于价值与事实的分界两边。也许法兰克福学派根本无法建立新的理性概念，因为它未能完全理解旧的理性概念。\n\n技术与启蒙\n\n伊恩·安格斯在《技术与启蒙》一书中对上述理论做出了综合。②他用胡塞尔关于现代性危机的现象学理论来讨论霍克海默对合理性形式的区分。安格斯论证说，在前现代社会中，统一的世界观组织着人类的知觉。生活世界是一个融贯的整体，在其中涌现出目的。宇宙秩序使农民和贵族的劳动神圣化，并赋予人们要为之服务的目的。前现代技术—工艺将这些目的当成起始点来制作有用的人造物。正是因为世界观是组织并排序各种目的的基础，工艺总是处于社会控制之下。客观理性占主导地位。\n\n188\n\n技术体系：理性的社会生活\n\n① Herbert Marcuse, \"Beyond One-Dimensional Man,\"in Towards a Critical Theory of Society,117-118.\n\n② Ian H. Angus, Technique and Enlightenment: Limits of Instrumental Reason (Lanham, MD: University Press ofAmerica, 1984).","previous_page":187,"next_page":null}