{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","uuid":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","normalized_title":"技术体系理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","isbns":["9787552024104"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":328,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E4%BD%93%E7%B3%BB%EF%BC%9A%E7%90%86%E6%80%A7%E7%9A%84%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E7%94%9F%E6%B4%BB","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/search"},"page":{"printed_page":"201 / 137","pdf_page":217,"physical_index":217,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"fecf2876dcf39420437f58871cce84ee3e8775d23e9e5c1ea0fdc5ff05346e9a"},"chapter":"第六章批判建构主义中的功能概念","content":"值得注意的是，这个理论中的计划概念不应取其字面上的意义，而是应该理解为跟随事实的重建人造物的方式。弗尔玛斯和豪克斯允许非形式化和不完全的意向，因为它们比对详细计划的事先斟酌还要常见。这个理论经受了出于不同考虑的检验，比如它是否能区分“合适的使用”与不常见的、突发性的使用，以及它是否能够说明有用对象的功能故障。\n\n尽管我同意功能的归属无须预设信念，我想更好地理解当以技术意向面对世界时我们如何行为。在这种特殊的信念下，主体在面对对象时会产生怎样的倾向？它与科学、商业和游戏域境中所追求的信念有什么不同？我要展示的是，回答这些问题牵扯到对特定种类对象的理解，而这些对象是功能归属以及相应的主观性形式的基础。\n\n第六章批判建构主义中的功能概念\n\n201\n\n①“ICE”指组合意向、因果和演化(intentional，causal，and evolutionary)的功能理论。 Wybo Houkes and Pieter E. Vermaas, Technical Functions : On the Use and Design of Artefacts, Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol. 1 (New York: Springer, 2010); M. Franssen, P. Vermaas, P. Kroes, and A. W. M. Meijers, eds. , Philosophy of Technology: After the Empirical Turn (Berlin: Springer Verlag, 2016)。另一个综合了大量功能研究成果的重要例子可参看BethPreston，“WhyIs a Wing Like a Spoon? A Pluralist Theory of Function,\" Journal of Philosophy, 95, no.5(1998):215-254。\n\n137\n\n② Houkes and Vermaas, Technical Functions, 11 - 12","previous_page":216,"next_page":218}