{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","uuid":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","normalized_title":"技术体系理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","isbns":["9787552024104"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":328,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E4%BD%93%E7%B3%BB%EF%BC%9A%E7%90%86%E6%80%A7%E7%9A%84%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E7%94%9F%E6%B4%BB","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/search"},"page":{"printed_page":210,"pdf_page":226,"physical_index":226,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"889bbb6873b3cfcbd29c85eaf1e291db301e7810d611eb17b683d04fbc7490db"},"chapter":"第六章批判建构主义中的功能概念","content":"尽管海德格尔没有发展出一个功能理论，他的论据展示了功能现象的重要特征，并邀请后人沿着他开辟的方向去完成他的理论。他的本质性直觉是“涉入”(involvement)概念。他宣称实体必须是自由地通过进入指称系统而获得涉入。实体实现进入需通过那些能够让其获取指称关系的性质，我们今天将之称为对象的“可供性”(affordances)。海德格尔通过不同寻常的对生产的说明来发展这个概念，其研究对理解功能性有许多富有启发性的暗示。\n\n在《存在与时间》中，海德格尔主要关注的是日常行为而非生产。他对生产的评论因此十分简短，然而这些评论很清楚地将生产的材料与自然科学的对象区分开来。前者在它们为了特定目的被生产成一件特定的技术对象之前就已经从属于世界，②海德格尔并未说明它们是如何从属的。\n\n最接近于形成生产理论的是对亚里士多德《形而上学》中的“动力”(dynamis)概念的分析，③海德格尔把亚里士多德解释成一位现象学的支持者。用现象学词汇来表述，生产的物质即亚里士多德的“事物”(matter)，可以自由地、以某种非特定的方式允许各种不同的使用。在这些可能性中做出选择便消除了物质的含混性，即在原始未被决定的多重性的背景中，将多重性减少成为在某一特定的使用背景下的有用性质。\n\n210\n\n技术体系：理性的社会生活\n\n143\n\n① Steven Galt Crowell, Normativity and Phenomenology in Husserl and Heidegger (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), 28- 30.\n\n② Heidegger, Being andTime,100 - 101.\n\n③ Martin Heidegger, Aristotle's Metaphysics 1 - 3: On the Essence andActuality of Force, trans. W. Brogan and P. Warnek (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1995).","previous_page":209,"next_page":211}