{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","uuid":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","normalized_title":"技术体系理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","isbns":["9787552024104"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":328,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E4%BD%93%E7%B3%BB%EF%BC%9A%E7%90%86%E6%80%A7%E7%9A%84%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E7%94%9F%E6%B4%BB","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/search"},"page":{"printed_page":215,"pdf_page":231,"physical_index":231,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"af809f624150e4cfa24fc3088db4ca77fb813bd7ef57449baa2c75232afcd153"},"chapter":"第六章批判建构主义中的功能概念","content":"海德格尔式的技术理论将功能性看作是实质性实在的丧失。事物从它们的环境中抽离、被分解、被储藏、被移动、被转变后，去做各种非自然的事情。用海德格尔早期分析的方式来看，这意味着失去复杂的系统性以及使对象得以安置在世界中的中介一换言之，即失去支持技术实践进行操纵的意义与规范。所留下的只是事物与能量，最低限度的可被控制的东西。②“现代技术的特点是它不再仅是一种手段’，也不再仅为了服务’于他者，而是它自己发展了一种对自己的支配。”③\n\n技术采用的理论对与功能归属相关的“信念”提供了更具体的刻画。前面曾提到，这些信念只是关于在技术环境中运作的对象的性质。海德格尔的后期研究对这个界限加入了遵从定律因而可被预测的性质。相关的信念必须包括定律的观念，在这个观念下对象可用来为某一计划服务。这说明了为什么在现代社会中与功能性相关的信念中因果性占据重要地位。海德格尔早期研究中描述的文化意义与重要性在现代社会被隐含的自然主义本体论掩盖了。技术采用理论也提供了一个现代技术主观性理论的梗概，强调了计划者超然性的认知立场。\n\n第六章 批判建构主义中的功能概念\n\n215\n\n① Martin Heidegger, The Question Concerning Technology, and Other Essays, trans. H, B. Lovitt (New York: Harper & Row, 1977).\n\n② Michael E. Zimmerman, Heidegger's Confrontation with Modernity: Technology, Politics, Art (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1990), 212.\n\n③ Martin Heidegger, Holderlin's Hymn The Ister', trans. W. McNeill and J. Davis (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1996) , 4.","previous_page":214,"next_page":216}