{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","uuid":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","normalized_title":"技术体系理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","isbns":["9787552024104"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":328,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E4%BD%93%E7%B3%BB%EF%BC%9A%E7%90%86%E6%80%A7%E7%9A%84%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E7%94%9F%E6%B4%BB","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/search"},"page":{"printed_page":218,"pdf_page":234,"physical_index":234,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"10dd5e7436378ed21247ca42b1ff4dc326508771e8a66101c52a12761e181d4f"},"chapter":"第六章批判建构主义中的功能概念","content":"卢卡奇的《历史与阶级意识》预示了后期海德格尔的技术理论。两人都论证了现代性(在卢卡奇那里，即资本主义现代性)的特征是将整个世界功能化的倾向。卢卡奇将具体对象和前现代社会的各种关系，与被现代技术抽离后的产品和管理系统的非人性化效果进行了对比。②然而，作为马克思主义者，卢卡奇更加强调商品化而不是技术，并坚持社会主义的替代方案。在展示了世界大战中技术的绝对威力以及苏联对其承诺的背叛，海德格尔认为所有现代社会都类似。\n\n卢卡奇并不比海德格尔对功能哲学更感兴趣，但是他的反思却为功能哲学提供了丰富的含义。本章开始已经提到，功能性有主观和客观二重特征。海德格尔的世界性理论和技术采用理论有助于我们思考功能性的客观性层面，而卢卡奇的物化理论对理解主观性层面则更有用。而且，卢卡奇的理论明晰地分析了整个技术体系的技术特征，包括管理和市场。\n\n卢卡奇论证资本主义经济就像自然世界的一部分那样遵循定律。这是一种第二自然，与第一自然一样受到技术操纵。他写道：“清楚地认识到这点很重要。所有人类关系(作为社会行为的对象)越来越多地预设了自然科学概念系统中的抽象成分和自然定律中的抽象基础。同时，这种行动”的主体也越来越多地预设了对人造抽象过程的纯粹观察者的态度，即实验者的态度。”①\n\n149\n\n218\n\n技术体系：理性的社会生活\n\n①Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Les Aventures de La Dialectique (Paris: Galli-mard, 1955). 海德格尔与卢卡奇之间的对比，参见Franck Fischbach，Laprivation de monde: Temps, espace et capital (Paris: Vrin, 2011), chap. 3.\n\n② Lukacs, History and Class Consciousness, 97, 236.","previous_page":null,"next_page":null}