{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","uuid":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","normalized_title":"技术体系理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","isbns":["9787552024104"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":328,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E4%BD%93%E7%B3%BB%EF%BC%9A%E7%90%86%E6%80%A7%E7%9A%84%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E7%94%9F%E6%B4%BB","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/search"},"page":{"printed_page":"224 / 153","pdf_page":240,"physical_index":240,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"08ba745a896d2d64d8422a98b6230dbb4dc255a2f339cf1b886aa3ea720ae651"},"chapter":"第六章批判建构主义中的功能概念","content":"工具化的理论\n\n为了说明作为自然现象的功能性，我的早期著作发展出我称作“工具化的理论”(instrumentalizationtheory)。②这个理论说明了不同技术维度如何反映在技术主客体结构中。比如，对功能可供性的辨别，要求对受技术控制的对象的相关方面去域境化，以及对它与其他类似去域境化的对象的联系去域境化，以形成一个技术层面上的融贯体系。如同安格斯指出的，去域境化的特征必须与对象在未以技术视角为媒介的生活世界的域境中的完整实现区分开来。然而，对象无法通过这种过程还原为因果关系。一个意义系统支持着对特定特征的构成性选择，而不是支持同样可能的替代选择。功能只有通过融入到这种意义的参考系中才能获取其特殊性与目的。设计不可避免地反映着技术功能性的二重性。不存在单纯的技术；技术已经是文化的。\n\n工具化的理论引发了对技术二重性的两种相互关联的说明。\n\n224\n\n技术体系：理性的社会生活\n\n153\n\n理论发展。①\n\n① Herbert Marcuse, “Contributions to a Phenomenology of Historical Materialism,\" in Heideggerian Marxism, ed. R. Wolin and J. Abromeit, trans. E. Oberle (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2005) , 31 - 32; Marcuse,One-Dimensional Man, 228, 239 - 240; Andrew Feenberg, Heidegger and Marcuse: The Catastrophe and Redemption of History (New York: Routledge, 2005), chap. 5.\n\n②早期的表述参见Feenberg，Transforming Technology，chap.7。近期的简洁表述作 为例子可见 Sara M. Grimes and Andrew Feenberg,“Critical Theory of Technology,” in The Sage Handbook of Digital Technology Research, ed. Sara Price, Carey Jewitt, and Barry Brown (London:Sage,2013),121-129。","previous_page":239,"next_page":241}